Good investors understand that a loss is only realized when you make it realized.
I realized this past week my TSLA holdings went down the equivalent of a 60kWh Model S. I still call that a loss.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good investors understand that a loss is only realized when you make it realized.
I realized this past week my TSLA holdings went down the equivalent of a 60kWh Model S. I still call that a loss.
Good investors understand that a loss is only realized when you make it realized.
That is true when you are talking common stock.
When you are talking about options that is a whole different story. When I only had common stock I didn't bat an eye at any price drops, I wouldn't have on this one either. However with options that will expire at a loss or worthless, this month, next, or even March of next year it's a whole different mentality.
That being said I am personally hoping the stock gets beat down tomorrow to one of the support levels DaveT mentioned in his mega post, I'd like to see 120 or even 108, and for the stock to hold it there even through Monday so I can pick up some jan 2016 options.
If this happens all the short term losses I had in the past week should easily be recouped.
I worry about tomorrow. I don't know how many people knew about the 3rd fire during trading. I checked the stock a couple of times during the day when I could, and google search results, but did not see the fire news until the end of the day.
That being said I am personally hoping the stock gets beat down tomorrow to one of the support levels DaveT mentioned in his mega post, I'd like to see 120 or even 108, and for the stock to hold it there even through Monday so I can pick up some jan 2016 options.
If this happens all the short term losses I had in the past week should easily be recouped.
Changed my mind. I'm still in. I'm just sick of all the drama every time there's a fire etc. The company is sound, they are still on track to achieve their goals. I think what I really need is to unsubscribe from this thread and try to forget about my stock for a few years...
I know we are under 141 now but i would put that on the Markets shoulders, we hit it and bounced off it early morning and the NASDAQ just kept crashing the rest of the day. If the market is happy tomorrow i am sure we will be back at $145. (we were on our way there after the morning bounce off of 141 but then the market kept taking and took TSLA down)
(i currently hold no stake in TSLA and will wait until some stability is found)
.... Its not normal that its catching fire every time
...
You may be right. Tomorrow is also the jobs report which could drive the overall market higher.
That is very dangerous statement that causes people to lose all their money. Many stocks have gone from high values to bankrupt.Good investors understand that a loss is only realized when you make it realized.
This comment (from Tesla, apparently?) was just sent out by Dougherty & Co.:
"Tesla is production constrained at present because the factory is still ramping. Tesla is not cell constrained right now and won’t be for another three to four years. Tesla has ample battery supply available to double and even triple current production. That was unclear on the call and we did not make it clear in our conversations with investors this week."
I felt like that was relatively clear on the call, but considering how everyone here has been talking about battery cell constraints for the last couple days, I thought I'd put this out there.
There's still the other 1% component that doesn't ramp besides the battery. I think they are why the production rate is so low. Did anyone else get that from the conference call? Or is it just me?
There's still the other 1% component that doesn't ramp besides the battery. I think they are why the production rate is so low. Did anyone else get that from the conference call? Or is it just me?
I think you might have misheard some of the conversation around lithium supply:
"Raw materials are not an issue. That is correct. I wouldn't worry about say lithium supply, or there is a lot of lithium out there and the main constituents really in the cell are, by weight or actually nickel and cobalt, aluminum then lithium. Lithium is like maybe 1% of the cell in that. Maybe 2%"
Is it possible this is what you're referring to?
My impression was that he said that the battery is the main constraint, but there are a few other things that are almost as constrained. Then he said something like they weren't working on those other things as much because they were already constrained by the battery anyway.