Lindenwood
Active Member
I specifically meant without rollout subtracted!That's not very fast because with a completely stock (not a single thing removed) M3P stealth I have a 2.98 0-60 on dragy. The 10.7 is good though.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I specifically meant without rollout subtracted!That's not very fast because with a completely stock (not a single thing removed) M3P stealth I have a 2.98 0-60 on dragy. The 10.7 is good though.
You’re talking fantasy. I’ve owned the model Y performance and you’re never gonna get 3.2 seconds. Maybe with perfect conditions- 3.7 seconds.A full second difference is almost 50 feet difference 0-60 mph. You couldn’t be more wrong unless you are driving around in a 50 foot car that does 0-60 mph in about 3 seconds.
View attachment 870165
View attachment 870166
If you are near Maryland:I'm convinced there are enough practical benefits to 18's. Is there a good forged (or sufficiently light) aero wheel option for 18" ? I was hoping to get the aero highway range boost. I saw an earlier thread where people were using M3 stock aero wheels.
Aftermarket:If you are near Maryland:
Sold - 2019 aero wheels/tires/tpms
Located in northern Maryland but can meet folks anywhere in the area. Will not ship. Tires are almost down to wear bars but you may be able to get another few miles (check with a tire expert). Wheels have some minor scuffs Non-Bluetooth TPMS sensors all work fine Price $200 - would like...teslamotorsclub.com
There is another aftermarket 18 with aero caps, but not sure why you wouldn't snag the Tesla wheels, especially at used prices like above.
There has been a lot of debate about what effects smaller and lighter wheels have on the Model 3 Performance. I am here to end that debate.
That's an M3P, it does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds.What disproves the acceleration limited theory is regardless of the accuracy of their methods, it clearly is "approximately" 1 full second faster 0-60.
Even if their measurements were off by 50%, it still puts the last nail in the coffin of the acceleration limited via computer theory.
Posted and discussed in this very thread starting on post #93, just 18 posts before yours, back when the video came out in May:These guys removed the most weight. Result 0-60 time dropped from 3.8 to 2.8 seconds.
They could be counting Mississippis...It's probably the worst potential testing environment you could use as a basis for measuring this, other than just having someone eyeball it and use a stop watch.