That's easy for you to say.
What did he say? He is now resorting to post blanks?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's easy for you to say.
We should have a good idea a month from now on wether or not Tesla will do good and fix our batteries. Right or am I wrong?
For further progress in the use of electric vehicles and energy storage systems from the network, it is desirable to develop the chemistry of lithium-ion cells, which provides a longer service life at high temperatures and high voltage cells without a significant increase in cost. The introduction of sacrificial electrolyte additives on the order of a few weight percent is a practical method to form protective solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layers that limit electrolyte decomposition during cell storage and operation. In recent years, significant efforts have allowed to obtain a large number of such additives that can be used to improve the characteristics of cells for various applications.
This patent provides compositions for use as electrolyte additives in lithium-ion battery systems and relates to the chemical composition of rechargeable battery systems, including active electrolyte additives, to improve the properties of rechargeable lithium-ion battery systems. This disclosure covers new battery systems with fewer active electrolyte additives that can be used in various energy storage applications, for example, in vehicles and power systems. More specifically, this disclosure includes additive electrolyte systems that enhance performance and lifetime of lithium-ion batteries, while reducing costs from other systems that rely on more or other additives.
it's already a "not" to Tesla doing the right thing. Mediation is a delay tactic and nothing more. To come to an agreement they have to return full charging speed and uncap everyone. If Tesla wanted to do the right thing they didn't need to get sued they just wouldn't have done the wrong thing over and over.We should have a good idea a month from now on wether or not Tesla will do good and fix our batteries. Right or am I wrong?
That's strange (interrupted charging a symptom of your dying battery) because there are many others with dying batteries on this thread and none of them have reported interrupted super charging as a symptom despite your specific post asking if anyone else is experiencing that.I don't think it's the port or anything mechanical. My battery is dying and those are signs of it happening. If it was that it wouldn't say 'DC charging'. A poor connection would trigger the system to reduce AC charging as well and cause a different error message.
Don't do it! 2014 AP1 MS. This software no longer allows sizing the browser to anything other than full screen. Other apps. like music will take up half screen so I can view that and Nav. Since I run TeslaWaze in the browser, I can no longer view Waze and Nav at the same time. Otherwise, I got absolutely no value out of that update. Only browser restrictions. I did ask Tesla. Here's what I got back. "This is intentional. We’re no longer doing the split window setup on the center display."I have 2019.40.2.3 staged to install but haven’t allowed it to install.
What did he say? He is now resorting to post blanks?
Text is there in invisible/white font. Just highlight and you can read - if you want.
Great news. I’m willing to ship my car to CA, if they would replace the battery...lolQuick update: they confirmed they are replacing the HV battery and the replacement should get to the SC tomorrow--not sure what is showing up, but should know tomorrow. Turnaround seems to be pretty quick (car went I on the 23rd), but I am sure being is CA helps.
Unfortunately no. If the concern was safety and they kept it a secret and never made any repairs or informed the authorities in charge of determining whether safety was even a potential issue, they did the most dangerously irresponsible wrong thing they could have done. There is nothing more likely to cause death or injury they could possibly have done than that, and it isn't just "the wrong thing" that is "the most criminal thing" they could do.If the concern was safety and the quick fix was capping and limiting that was actually the right thing.
I would of respected Tesla more if they told us they were capping it upfront, and then how and when they would take corrective action by repairing or replacing the battery.If the concern was safety and the quick fix was capping and limiting that was actually the right thing. They simply do not have the batteries available to recall all vehicles and replace packs. Obviously they aren't being honest with customers as to what's actually happening but without replacement packs available I'm not sure what else they could have done. Not capping and limiting affected vehicles would have been wrong if the potential result was fires.
I'm sorry but that is ridiculous. Tesla found an issue and took immediate action to prevent the problem from causing a fire. With the immediate problem solved they then continued investigating and working on other solutions. The only other thing they could have done was immediately recalled all affected vehicles, but with no replacement packs available people would have been without their cars, or be given ICE rentals from Tesla, for months. Obviously it would have been a disaster for the company, from which it may never have recovered, which would have meant no replacement packs for anyone in the future.Unfortunately no. If the concern was safety and they kept it a secret and never made any repairs or informed the authorities in charge of determining whether safety was even a potential issue, they did the most dangerously irresponsible wrong thing they could have done. There is nothing more likely to cause death or injury they could possibly have done than that, and it isn't just "the wrong thing" that is "the most criminal thing" they could do.
Tesla found an issue and took immediate action to prevent the problem from causing a fire. With the immediate problem solved they then continued investigating and working on other solutions.
Obviously it would have been a disaster for the company, from which it may never have recovered, which would have meant no replacement packs for anyone in the future.
You're charged to 38%. Charge to 100% to see if you are capped. 4.2v = 100% if uncapped.So I did my first scan. If I’m interpreting this correctly, my cells look consistent but I’m definitely capped.
View attachment 505480
I don't want to imagine how much worse that imagination could get!'that is "the most criminal thing" they could do.'
You suffer from a lack of imagination -- you would make a very poor super-villain (or Bond movie script writer). If I were Tesla, I could easily find a lot "more criminal things to do".
You need to charge to at least 80% (preferably 100%), unplug and check again (if charging to > 80%, be prepared to drive or have the coolant pumps run to burn off excess charge).So I did my first scan. If I’m interpreting this correctly, my cells look consistent but I’m definitely capped.
(images snipped)