JRP3
Hyperactive Member
You're hung up on "legality". I'm simply stating that sending out an immediate fix was the best response, not mailing out legal but completely useless notices.No they didn't. We know for a fact that this is not true because we were not mailed a recall notice or informed in any way, which is the only legal response.
In order for action to be taken - and batterygate is an action - the NHTSA has to OK it and owners have to be informed. Failure to do so is illegal
Again you're more concerned with proper procedure and legality than actually protecting people. It seems you'd be happier if Tesla went the slower, "legal" route, and while NHTSA deliberated as to what to do people's cars were catching fire. We'll simply have to disagree on that one.
And what you're saying is "Tesla should have done nothing other than notify NHTSA, who would then take their sweet time deciding what if anything should be done, while vehicles caught fire and endangered people".What you're saying is "Tesla is hiding a problem and hasn't reported it. I hope maybe nobody will be killed but we can only hope and pray that my guess bout their crimes are correct but that I'm wrong about the rest."
Of course the opposite happened in reality, Tesla took action to protect people instead of starting a lot of paperwork which would have in fact delayed real action.If Tesla did what you say they did, they are intentionally NOT taking action to address a high risk fatal flaw and are willing to break the law and continually put people in danger to save a few dollars.
We know they didn't do anything to stop fires because, by law, they have to tell the NHTSA and us if they did and it's been so long one of us would have been informed by now.
Legal action is not the only action. I've pointed out how taking action to mitigate the problem is faster and better than the "legal" route. You can ignore that if you like.