V3 now gives roughly 1 hour and 5 minutes. V2 still sucks though (around 1 hour and 20 minutes).
In both cases, the estimated time remains tampered and shows pre-capping estimates
Yes, the estimates are so off when choosing anything from 90% or up. Albeit, when setting max charge to e.g. 80% or below the calculation seems to be better, similar to the estimated available range in the energy app. The newest for my 2015 S85 so far was 2020.36.11 and it seemed the charging times when routing through several SuCs was more accurate, if the charge goal was below 80% than with earlier versions. But then again, since I live and drive in Germany, the routing were never able to reflect the 150kmph I used to drive when allowed, thus I am running the abrp/classic web routing in parallel to setting the next SuC in the Tesla routing.
Did anyone notice if the routing still does the recalculation of charging times?
With earlier versions, I noticed when routing a longer distance the SuC stops shows a relatively short charging time, but after a couple of seconds the charging times are significantly increased.Thus the SuC stops seems to be optimized for newer cars whom are capable of higher charge rates per soc. With e.g. abrp/classic I am able to limit the max charge, add average consumption and max velocity plus degradation, ambient factors as temperature and loaded weight etc.
I'm wondering, did the non-linear portion of the soc in percentage changed in the newest f/w?
You wonder what I'm referring to with non-linear? Let me explain, when it comes to a gas tank, I expect a certain linearity, filling it up to e.g. 60l I expect to have 30l at 50% and so on. This seems not the behavior in my S85, I've noticed this back with v8 or v9: When looking at the estimated range in e.g. the energy app at high charge levels, the kWh equivalent is higher than the actually used energy.
It will become more clear when you test it the other way around:
Next time you are at a SuC and to reach your destination or next SuC you need more than 15% soc to add. The navigation shows the approximate charging time and you are able to choose "Weiterfahren" (drive on?). The navigation algorithm will calculate a negative soc value for your next stop, if it is too negative, you will get some placeholder. But somewhere in the minus 20%ish it starts showing negative values. When it reaches 5% soc at next destination, it stops increasing albeit the soc is still increasing, this goes on for ~6% and then it starts increasing again in parallel to the soc.
Is this still the same with the most recent f/w or even worse?
BR! Oaito.
