islandbayy
Active Member
Am I missing something with the docket? It wasn't updated for July 16th, or is there usually delays in the updates?
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Wiki Sudden Loss Of Range With 2019.16.x Software
- Thread starter Dutchmeeuw
- Start date
I wouldn't be surprised if they just put the wrong date and meant 7/30. (They have put the wrong year on multiple filings in the past.)
lightningltd
Member
Well, something tells me they have been monkeying with the BMS code in the last 2 minor updates...
When I go into the app, tap an charge, then move the slider to 100%, it normally shows a stable number (like 228 miles). Since the last update, the number fluctuates +-10 miles daily, and sometimes several times a day. My 90% charge max is affected as well, stopping at different numbers daily. Also, since the updates, I seem to have 'misplaced' another 8 miles. Is that what they are doing with the delays, pissing with us in the firmware? I asked the SC and they gave me the old 'you must be showing ideal' line of crap again, like I am some kind of noobie. Jeez. I showed them, then it changed to 'it will fluctuate with temperature'. Was not like this before for rated. They didn't even bother pulling the logs to see if there was an error, but advised me I could make an appointment and pay a diagnostic fee. MOST displeased. I guess us founders are nothing to Tesla anymore.
When I go into the app, tap an charge, then move the slider to 100%, it normally shows a stable number (like 228 miles). Since the last update, the number fluctuates +-10 miles daily, and sometimes several times a day. My 90% charge max is affected as well, stopping at different numbers daily. Also, since the updates, I seem to have 'misplaced' another 8 miles. Is that what they are doing with the delays, pissing with us in the firmware? I asked the SC and they gave me the old 'you must be showing ideal' line of crap again, like I am some kind of noobie. Jeez. I showed them, then it changed to 'it will fluctuate with temperature'. Was not like this before for rated. They didn't even bother pulling the logs to see if there was an error, but advised me I could make an appointment and pay a diagnostic fee. MOST displeased. I guess us founders are nothing to Tesla anymore.
That's just weird ... But not something I see observe with my car. Nothing has changed for me since I got capacity capped with 2019.16 over two years ago.Well, something tells me they have been monkeying with the BMS code in the last 2 minor updates...
When I go into the app, tap an charge, then move the slider to 100%, it normally shows a stable number (like 228 miles). Since the last update, the number fluctuates +-10 miles daily, and sometimes several times a day. My 90% charge max is affected as well, stopping at different numbers daily. Also, since the updates, I seem to have 'misplaced' another 8 miles. Is that what they are doing with the delays, pissing with us in the firmware? I asked the SC and they gave me the old 'you must be showing ideal' line of crap again, like I am some kind of noobie. Jeez. I showed them, then it changed to 'it will fluctuate with temperature'. Was not like this before for rated. They didn't even bother pulling the logs to see if there was an error, but advised me I could make an appointment and pay a diagnostic fee. MOST displeased. I guess us founders are nothing to Tesla anymore.
DonovanMS85D
Member
So this is what the new models are getting. 1044 miles in an hour! I am lucky to get 140 miles in an hour.
Brass Guy
Active Member
Whoa, is that what you pay if you don't have FUSC? $5.67 for16 miles?!? That's like $1.00 per kwh...
lightningltd
Member
So.. Since after all the updates, my S85 has even less range than an S70, it is now an S65. When will I get my $15,000.00 refund for the price difference and the new S65 badge for the car?
cpa
Active Member
You need to visit the Tesla claims office in Antarctica to fill out the paperwork.
Actually the Tesla Claims office has now moved to Mars; book your tickets soon to avoid disappointment.
DonovanMS85D
Member
That is not my car, picture came from the Denver Tesla Club Facebook page.
Guy V
Member
I'm sorry to hear that's still your situation. I've avoided reposting that I got lucky and mine returned to the satisfactory trend of 2 years ago, but I would still very much like Tesla offer a cost-effective out of warranty battery replacement solution. Sooner or later anyone who wants to keep their car very long term, as was suggested as feasible by Tesla from the beginning, will need that. After this 2-year episode I continuously feel my otherwise healthy and well-performing car is living on borrowed time.
Thanks Guy. At this point, I'm not sure how many owners are in the same boat as I'm. But I'm very happy for you and others whose taken capacity has been restored.
The parallels between Apple and Tesla are fascinating - Apple took it's time as well to come up with the battery replacement program for iPhones - and today the replacement prices are reasonable and everyone can plan accordingly - I hope and pray Tesla will arrive there sooner than later.
Well I was wrong, it appears that they didn't put the wrong date, it just took a little longer than the expected...
Big news: There is a proposed settlement.
They estimated that actual damages were $175/vehicle, and that it would be risky to even get that at trial, so the $625/vehicle settlement is a good deal for the class.
Of course the attorney's take 27%, ~$410k, of the settlement fund. While DJRas gets $1,000 for his effort.
Big news: There is a proposed settlement.
They estimated that actual damages were $175/vehicle, and that it would be risky to even get that at trial, so the $625/vehicle settlement is a good deal for the class.
Of course the attorney's take 27%, ~$410k, of the settlement fund. While DJRas gets $1,000 for his effort.
The lawyers always win in these cases and the class always gets a pittance - no matter if the damage was real or not. I'm sure that Tesla is happy to pay $1.5M to make this go away.
What about all the other complaints in the lawsuit? Any word on those?Well I was wrong, it appears that they didn't put the wrong date, it just took a little longer than the expected...
Big news: There is a proposed settlement.
They estimated that actual damages were $175/vehicle, and that it would be risky to even get that at trial, so the $625/vehicle settlement is a good deal for the class.
Of course the attorney's take 27%, ~$410k, of the settlement fund. While DJRas gets $1,000 for his effort.
The only thing I see is:
Maybe @DJRas can let us know what the plan is for the other issues. Are they just being dropped?
DonovanMS85D
Member
I have filed a complaint with the Colorado State Attorney Generals Office. We will see if anything happens.
Well I was wrong, it appears that they didn't put the wrong date, it just took a little longer than the expected...
Big news: There is a proposed settlement.
They estimated that actual damages were $175/vehicle, and that it would be risky to even get that at trial, so the $625/vehicle settlement is a good deal for the class.
Of course the attorney's take 27%, ~$410k, of the settlement fund. While DJRas gets $1,000 for his effort
Iphone gate people got more. Lol wow just wow or at least it seems like it. Well I'll take my money and sell this junk of car.
Similar threads
