ICUDoc
Active Member
Suspect you can make it display whatever you like?Double displays showing the same thing? Doesn’t seem very optimized? At least it explains the price, guess some customers value this?!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Suspect you can make it display whatever you like?Double displays showing the same thing? Doesn’t seem very optimized? At least it explains the price, guess some customers value this?!
Probably yes, with Android Auto. I don’t think you can do it with Apple CarPlay.Netflix?
Huh, may have to give AA another try on our SUV then, thought it was app limited.Probably yes, with Android Auto. I don’t think you can do it with Apple CarPlay.
Probably yes, with Android Auto. I don’t think you can do it with Apple CarPlay.
My bad. For some reason I thought I read that it did.The Taycan doesn't have AA at this time. (They may add it in the future.) It does have CP.
wow, that 0-200 looked quick!I was driving the Porsche Taycan Turbo (non S) today. Check this out, very nice:
The Porsche did this 26 times with a slowest to fastest variance of less than one seconds.
The Porsche did this 26 times with a slowest to fastest variance of less than one seconds.
The Tesla is varying by about 4 seconds. That's literally making their point. When I watch that video I see way closer to 20s on the last few runs.
You don't get to pretend you can control for battery effects when the test is in no way the same. He doesn't stop, doesn't use the launch control, doesn't reach the same 220-230 kmh that the Porsche test was doing.
Porsche did this in controlled conditions, with a cool down between each launch.The Porsche did this 26 times with a slowest to fastest variance of less than one seconds.
The Tesla is varying by about 4 seconds. That's literally making their point. When I watch that video I see way closer to 20s on the last few runs.
You don't get to pretend you can control for battery effects when the test is in no way the same. He doesn't stop, doesn't use the launch control, doesn't reach the same 220-230 kmh that the Porsche test was doing.
It was not done by Porsche, but by Jonny Smith of Fully Charged. And he was driving back and forth on a runway without cool down periods. Lastly I’ll point out that the Taycan accelerated way harder.Porsche did this in controlled conditions, with a cool down between each launch.
Bjorn did this in the Model 3, in non-controlled conditions, with no cool downs.
We have no idea which (if any) of the shots in the video were recorded while Smith was doing his test. He confirmed on Twitter that the launches were back to back.I remember reading, on Rennlist I think, that the video showed Jonny's watch a few times and the total time was about an hour. In other words, not back to back.
But in any case, it’s probably true that the Model 3 with its newer cooling system loses less power in repeated hard launches than the Model S. But it’s also a much slower car than either the P100D or the Taycan Turbo/Turbo S. Note that it took Bjoern around 16s to get to 200km/h (and he didn’t even launch from a stop). The Taycan did it in under 10s, even though it is significantly heavier than the Model 3. It should be obvious that this strains the electric drive train much more because the battery has to deliver more power to accerate harder. And the Model 3 still lost several seconds at the end. Is it really so hard to admit that the Porsche beats Tesla in some ways?
Is it really so hard to admit that the Porsche beats Tesla in some ways?
Looks like around 9 seconds 0-200kph.Note that it took Bjoern around 16s to get to 200km/h (and he didn’t even launch from a stop). The Taycan did it in under 10s, even though it is significantly heavier than the Model 3