Thank you for adding a reply in addition to the disagree.
I do agree that adding the power is a big deal, and people in ICE world would pay big money.
I don't agree that it is "artificial", or at least any more so that the limitations in programming on an ICE car or sizing the carb. My diesel can be "chipped" to gain huge performance. But it also has reliability issues. There is always going to be a bottleneck. In an EV, it just happens to be programmed in. What happens if cars start destroying half shafts now? They now have time on their side and real data on reliability.
A long time ago, I redid the motor in an old ford. Huge increase in performance, until I broke the output shaft and shattered the transmission case.
Anyway, back to my thought... Yes, it is a big deal. Yes, ICE folks would pay big money. Tesla made the decision not to charge. I personally feel that if people are pains in the (you know what) about it, they will never ever do anything like it again.
Haha, and sorry for whatever clicking that button did to your internet brownie points . I totally agree with you that soft performance points (let's call it that?) are NOT just because a manufacturer is financially greedy. I'm an engineer and I have to program in those points and/or do the investigation to determine what they are, all the time, for all sorts of reasons, both to benefit the company AND to benefit the customer.
Not suggesting that Tesla is just flipping a performance switch willy-nilly. There's definitely a balance of concerns that has to be reached to pick torque limits and acceleration ramps.