hitchhiker
Member
The problem being talked about here isn't just about Musk -- in fact he's sort of a minor player in the problem. He's only targeted because he's the current tall-weed-syndrome target of all such things, being the individual with the highest net worth. Its a strategy that's been used by very rich people for a while, including Bezos and numerous bankers. You never sell your stock -- you just borrow against it. Therefore you never make an income and can't be taxed since there is no income to tax. Then when you die, your heirs get a step-up valuation on the stock so that they dont' have to pay the tax on the value increase of the stock either.
Maybe the solution is to prohibit borrowing against stocks? But people do the same thing with real estate -- you just re-fi your property and live off that money tax free too (since you never sell your property). I think the solution is not simple. Maybe it involves some sort of property tax on securities? That would be hard to push in the US, since we've never had it and it would severely change the equation on investment and capital for just about everyone.
That said -- I'm not sure its fair to target Musk about this. I doubt he has any loans against his stock. He may have done that years ago, but when he started selling his houses a few years ago he made enough money off those sales to live off of. And now he's got billions from the stock he sold last year. I suspect he doesn't actually use this 'loophole' people are talking about.
Maybe the solution is to prohibit borrowing against stocks? But people do the same thing with real estate -- you just re-fi your property and live off that money tax free too (since you never sell your property). I think the solution is not simple. Maybe it involves some sort of property tax on securities? That would be hard to push in the US, since we've never had it and it would severely change the equation on investment and capital for just about everyone.
That said -- I'm not sure its fair to target Musk about this. I doubt he has any loans against his stock. He may have done that years ago, but when he started selling his houses a few years ago he made enough money off those sales to live off of. And now he's got billions from the stock he sold last year. I suspect he doesn't actually use this 'loophole' people are talking about.