You are right. My bad. I should not have compared FSD to any levels of automation as defined by the SAE.Which one are you when you just make up nonsense claims like below then attack multiple people trying to explain reality to you?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are right. My bad. I should not have compared FSD to any levels of automation as defined by the SAE.Which one are you when you just make up nonsense claims like below then attack multiple people trying to explain reality to you?
Eventually is a better word to use with Tesla....but yes.Does this mean the 2023.x cars will get moved to 2024 finally?
Even with navigation on, you can sometimes get 12.3 to turn at an intersection especially stop signs but not consistent, and it'll even disengage the turn signal after a bit because it knows it shouldn't be engaged to follow navigation. Even for switching lanes still with navigation on, 12.3 sometimes seems to be hesitant in obeying driver-engaged turn signals with some wobble back to the original lane.For those with FSD, if you don’t have navigation on, how does it react to turn signals?
Are Autopark and Smart Summon L3/L4?
Looks like they're all coming from 2024.2.7, but given that the version doesn't end in a multiple of 5, which FSD-Beta-focused builds tend to follow, I'm guessing this is related to 2024.2.12 introducing vision Autopark. .12 has only gone to 2023/2024 Model 3/Y so far, so .13 could be similarly focused on USS-less Model S/X vision Autopark (as opposed to getting 12.x to portrait S/X)?i also saw on Fi that 2024.8.13 is also pending, and it's only model S and X
So, you are still "driving" when you are outside the vehicle!!Not as they presently work. The key language in the summary of the SAE levels for 0-2 is "You must constantly supervise these support features."
If Tesla releases Actually Smart Summon and says "You do not need to monitor the vehicle, it can handle every object and event in a parking lot, and can safely pull over when it fails" then it would be L4.
So, you are still "driving" when you are outside the vehicle!!
Yeah, 2023.7.5 (and subsequent .10, .15, .20, etc.) introduced FSD Beta 11.4.x, so 2024.3.5 does seem higher chance to be 12.3.x for new vehicles. TeslaFi shows one install on a new 2024 S with 27 miles odometer (so ignore its update history as TeslaFi tracks "updates" by account as opposed to by VIN). Maybe this is a special non-.x00 "factory" build to get new vehicles on 12.3.1 as requested?Here is an odd ball update. The last time we had an uneven week numbering it was to bring FSD forward
NONE of the SAE Documents carry any legal strength. In other words it is group of engineers organized much like a kitty party who have mutually agreed to build some rules/standards et al that they have mutually agreed to adhere to. Nothing more. Nothing less. Surely one can expect good work from them but NONE of them will come forward to support their work in any legal proceedings.This is not semantics but actually SAE requirements. Tesla is L2 PERIOD.View attachment 1032320
So how do they monitor that the driver is paying attention. i.e. How to nag them?Yup. Location of the human is not directly relevant... out of the drivers seat, but having to constantly supervise the system? L2. IN the drivers seat but it's ok for you to read a book? L3.
1. Yes I know. It often doesn't give the best one.Two options I can think of:
1. If you are parked, the nav system will often give options for routing and let you pick one.
2. If that doesn't work, pick a way point that is along your preferred route, then cancel the stop as you get close, letting the system continue to your final destination. It's a bit of a kluge but it's the best I got.
They do in California.NONE of the SAE Documents carry any legal strength. In other words it is group of engineers organized much like a kitty party who have mutually agreed to build some rules/standards et al that they have mutually agreed to adhere to. Nothing more. Nothing less. Surely one can expect good work from them but NONE of them will come forward to support their work in any legal proceedings.
I hope nobody brings up SAE and their so called documents as “requirements”.