Gotta disagree there... I think Tesla logs whether it's steering, brake, or stick that disengaged. I'd REALLY HOPE that the steering correction is logged and reported as part of snapshots and disengagements (w/ the resulting snapshots). So, I disengage with stick when I mean "I want to go somewhere you don't" (know it's going to take the wrong lane, take a bad route and want it to reroute, etc). I disengage with wheel to say "Yo the lane is over here", and the brake to say "Yo, how about not sniffing that car's butthole".
Most of the time, I'm not surprised by TACC still running, and intend for it to do so. Sometimes, though rarely... TACC is on and it accelerates unexpectedly, and I brake that too. I respond really quickly to AP being stupid, not like most videos I see where the driver is ... pretty much letting FSD do its thing...
Hard to tell what the correct behavior would be, but honestly I'd lean towards steering breakout = TACC disengage as well, being something Tesla should implement. If braking disengages steering (and often, I wish it wouldn't), then having steering not complement disengaging acceleration as well is asymmetrical. Both modes ought to complement each other.
tl;dr: Tesla most likely uses the mode of disengagement as data, but I really believe they should disable TACC as well when disengaging by steering wheel.
