rxlawdude
Active Member
No they aren't. But your Sidney Powell like excuse to back out of your statement is noted.I thought italics were the universal internet sarcasm font. I would have included cursive font If I could.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No they aren't. But your Sidney Powell like excuse to back out of your statement is noted.I thought italics were the universal internet sarcasm font. I would have included cursive font If I could.
I assume you’re just trying to be humorous but a comment like you made is not appropriate and definitely off topic. I am referring to the Texas American/California Commies statement.
Actually the great irony of California is that the people pride themselves on their radical liberal beliefs but in practice the state has the “worst” income inequality (to the extent you consider that a problem) and the worst homelessness problems. I walk through hordes of homeless drug addicts on the streets of LA every morning, and the situation is no better in SF.True, but also true and the statement is 100% true.
Tesla temporarily halts production of its Model S and Model X
Tesla has not built any of its two most expensive cars -- the Model S and Model X -- so far this year.www.cnn.com
WTF. Although the headline seems like a clickbait given the lack of details in the article.
no reason to get political. Your comment is asinine. I suppose you can go back to watch all your TRUE, 100% fact-based news like OAN or Fox then huh?It's CNN - are there people who still thinks anything written by CNN is legitimate? It's fake news, like everything else they publish. They don't know anything.
no reason to get political. Your comment is asinine. I suppose you can go back to watch all your TRUE, 100% fact-based news like OAN or Fox then huh?
I have seen about 100 articles on InsideEV and other EV "news" sites with much non-factual and incorrect information. So it's not just CNN and there's no reason to call them out. The CNN article may have some incorrect information in it and as such, the journalist should be notified and his/she managers/editors should make changes moving forward so inaccurate information is not published in the future.It's not political - objectively - the article is complete bullshit. It's not surprising.
I have seen about 100 articles on InsideEV and other EV "news" sites with much non-factual and incorrect information. So it's not just CNN.
I guess I will have to take Fox news or Breitbart more seriously going forward.It's CNN - are there people who still think anything written by CNN is legitimate? It's fake news, like everything else they publish. They don't know anything.
Oh boy, I’m staying quiet on this topic.. how about some new pics of refresh model sWould you like to argue the verifiable/fact-checked inaccuracies and untruths spoken by our last president, our last presidential administration, and the past 12 months worth of so-called "news" reporting done by far-right media and compare that with more "mainstream" media? I would be happy do so but it would be quite lopsided, like 80/20 and your side would be the 80% on simple untruths, lies, and inaccurate information. It's called a "CON" and many are part of the "CULT." Don't even get me started on if you believe that the left are involved in child abductions and drinking the blood of children or that our previous president was the messiah, here to "save" everyone. Oh please, hahahahahahahahahaha! There will be some indictments coming...karma dude. btw - my Tesla account still says March.
Yes, we're good. I deleted my last reply to him; not worth getting into the stupidity of it all.hey folks, this is turning into a flame war. the only people that should be getting flamed are tesla for not communicating with us. but also praised for designing a car that looks kickass.
edit: @rezkyms beat me to it.
Would you like to argue the verifiable/fact-checked inaccuracies and untruths spoken by our last president, our last presidential administration, and the past 12 months worth of so-called "news" reporting done by far-right media and compare that with more "mainstream" media? I would be happy do so but it would be quite lopsided, like 80/20 and your side would be the 80% on simple untruths, lies, and inaccurate information. It's called a "CON" and many are part of the "CULT." Don't even get me started on if you believe that the left are involved in child abductions and drinking the blood of children or that our previous president was the messiah, here to "save" everyone. Oh please, hahahahahahahahahaha! There will be some indictments coming...karma dude. btw - my Tesla account still says March.
I've deleted my reply post and moved past all this now. Suggesting you do the same.lol - woah, there. howd we go from talking about a specific article from an unreliable news source regarding Tesla deliveries to all of this insane stuff you just posted?
Regardless, the CNN article should be disregarded - its not informed and inaccurate, like I previously mentioned. it doesnt tell us anything new or useful.
Here's the deal: MSNBC = Breitbart; NYTimes = Fox News. There is no legitimate journalism anymore. It's all addictive fodder for the partisans.I guess I will have to take Fox news or Breitbart more seriously going forward.
Well actually statistically it is true. It is not that every has a "set" of opposite beliefs, but that it is a common denominator of common beliefs. Republicans are far more likely to be against EV's, vaccines, climate change, abortions, lgbtq, and also believe in god and be racists. That is not saying all of them believe all of those things but there is clearly a distinction. And it is not that all Republicans are racist, but all racist seem to be Republicans. You can make whatever you want of this - or not - but people/parties are becoming more polarized.This is not true. You've bundled a bunch of opinions that you're against and then accused "them" (the anti-you's) of all of them.
I'd love to see your data on this assertion? Perhaps it's because when you are called out for your incorrect data, you, like almost every Dem out there, pull out the racist card. That's how most all dems defend themselves. If they don't like the facts, they call you racist. You seem to be a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group. This, my friend, is the definition of a bigot.All racist seem to be Republicans. You can make whatever you want of this - or not - but people/parties are becoming more polarized.
That is offensive to anyone with intelligence to say that about CNN.It’s the only one that is honest in my opinion.
Anyway, political threads are not a great idea in forums. I would avoid comments about that.