"Our logs show you haven't used the exterior door handle for 3 months, but you keep using the interior handle. Can you explain that? Are you sure it just failed?"Lol, yeah they aren’t gonna know. Also they boned me at 4500 miles for a new part
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Our logs show you haven't used the exterior door handle for 3 months, but you keep using the interior handle. Can you explain that? Are you sure it just failed?"Lol, yeah they aren’t gonna know. Also they boned me at 4500 miles for a new part
As long as the problem doesn't have any data logged as a result from it, they couldn't know. And if it did, who's to say that wasn't the first time you had available in your schedule to have it looked at.Lol, yeah they aren’t gonna know. Also they boned me at 4500 miles for a new part
What about the part that failed at 4300 miles? Faulty engineering? $131,000 car and $5200 paid for extended warranty. No other car customers put up with this treatment."Our logs show you haven't used the exterior door handle for 3 months, but you keep using the interior handle. Can you explain that? Are you sure it just failed?"
I don't know, you haven't provided any details. Why did they say it wasn't covered by the warranty?What about the part that failed at 4300 miles? Faulty engineering?
Ok, you had me intrigued and I was bored so I did a little digging:What about the part that failed at 4300 miles? Faulty engineering?
This happened to me today on an 11/2015 build.
Yeah I bought it used last year with 4300 miles on it. I’ve been driving it a lot more than it’s first 6 years
Yes, my battery heater failed at 49xx miles yes under 5k. They still billed me like it was normal. There would have been no discount if I didn’t have the extended warranty. I still felt irritated paying $200 for a part with less than 5k miles
This is your opinion. Any other car manufacturer would have covered this as goodwill with under 5k miles. Tesla gets a pass for being a lemon 100% of the time. Multiple things broke on my 3 under 2k miles also.Ok, you had me intrigued and I was bored so I did a little digging:
So you bought a car with almost no miles on it but it was 6-7 years old and the battery coolant heater failed. Well out of the factory warranty for everything except the battery and drive unit. It seems perfectly reasonable that Tesla would make you pay for that repair. (Yes, parts fail even with low mileage on them.)
Certainly not BMW in the case of my 81 year old mother.This is your opinion. Any other car manufacturer would have covered this as goodwill with under 5k miles. Tesla gets a pass for being a lemon 100% of the time. Multiple things broke on my 3 under 2k miles also.
Not a chance, my 90 year old grandmother is on her 4th transmission on her 04 Lincoln Aviator. It has 60,000 miles on it as of last weeks yearly oil change... Can't get her to get rid of it though, she is "used" to driving it. Though, I don't think she will be driving for much longer. She paid for all 4. If you count the 3 defective remanufactured ones Ford/Lincoln sent that were DOA, that's 7 transmissions in 60,000 miles. All of those 4 just outside the time limit of the warranty.This is your opinion. Any other car manufacturer would have covered this as goodwill with under 5k miles. Tesla gets a pass for being a lemon 100% of the time. Multiple things broke on my 3 under 2k miles also.
I will say, when I had my Motorcycle & Scooter shop, the two categories that had the most problems.So you bought a car with almost no miles on it but it was 6-7 years old and the battery coolant heater failed. Well out of the factory warranty for everything except the battery and drive unit. It seems perfectly reasonable that Tesla would make you pay for that repair. (Yes, parts fail even with low mileage on them.)
As for the Model X, it is ALMOST as good as the S. I have both a S and X. Realistically, they are pretty much identical in operation. One MAJOR and one Minor flaw of the Model X that really drives me nuts. Minor = The middle row of seats, the seat backs don't fold down. So I cannot put anything large in the truck. For how much more interior space the X has, I can move about half as much INSIDE the cabin. The MAJOR flaw, the God Dang Doors! I absolutely cannot stand the Falcon Wing Doors, and the powered front doors.
This couldn't be further from the truth.This is your opinion. Any other car manufacturer would have covered this as goodwill with under 5k miles. Tesla gets a pass for being a lemon 100% of the time. Multiple things broke on my 3 under 2k miles also.
I have a November 2016 Build MX, middle row doesn't fold :-( I can't stand the powered doors nearly at all. Only benefit is I can close everything but the hood with a fob press.The middle row is fixed only on the six seater. 5&7 -seaters have foldable middle row. Pre 2017 7-seaters were non-folding too, though. However, in the current model range, Plaid is only available as a six seater, so you have to get LR if you want folding seats! That's a silly limitation.
I like the MX doors. I wonder why MS doesn't have powered front doors? It should be very easy to add, the doors are very similar. The automatic opening is great. You don't have to touch the door, it opens automatically and then closes when you press brake pedal. You can disable this at your home address, it's convenient if you often have to move around the car without entering.
All this said, I still would prefer MS over MX. It's much better looking, has lower consumption, and is cheaper.. But I have four kids. Oldest one is 19 now, though, I'm waiting for him to move away so I can go back to MS..
Put in a powered Frunk kit and that will work too . I have had the EVOffer one on my 2017 S75D for 2yrs and use it daily.I have a November 2016 Build MX, middle row doesn't fold :-( I can't stand the powered doors nearly at all. Only benefit is I can close everything but the hood with a fob press.
Since they are now doing them under warranty, that makes sense. (Though they should still let you pay for it if you really want to.)Tesla told me they cannot do this repair unless an alert is present. In other words they will not proactively provide service unless you have received the error/warning message.
Actually it’s the opposite of what you said. If they really wanted to take care of customers they would proactively replace the fuse while the car is in for service. Instead by telling the customer they have to wait for an error message they are likely pushing some repairs out of warranty. When some (most) cars getting this error are newer than mine you have to wonder what Tesla is thinking (again).Since they are now doing them under warranty, that makes sense. (Though they should still let you pay for it if you really want to.)