Not to confuse with the David Rasmussen vs. Tesla Class Action lawsuit (focused on in this thread).
The video is about a different lawsuit and this owner:
Tesla Class Action Says Pre-Owned Warranties Aren't Honored | Top Class Actions
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shame they didn’t have a better understanding of the issue. But great that Tesla's behaviour is getting some publicity. And that the message is getting out, buy a Tesla at your peril. They are not to be trusted.
Same lawyer.Not to confuse with the David Rasmussen vs. Tesla Class Action lawsuit (focused on in this thread).
The video is about a different lawsuit and this owner:
Tesla Class Action Says Pre-Owned Warranties Aren't Honored | Top Class Actions
Poor communication is Tesla's core problem. If they had come clean at the start of this year and told us something vague and honest like "we are honoring your warranties but need to finish working on something new you'll like to make this better for all of us" most of us would have accepted that, and there wouldn't be a Class Action loss or NHTSA fines incoming. We waited a considerable amount of time and gave them many chances to do the right thing, and when they did sort of respond to us it was always lies. Tesla's poor communication isn't an accident or shortcoming, this is a policy of mismanagement from somewhere very high up in the company otherwise the person responsible for creating this problem would have been fired and their replacement would have fixed everything long ago/ Maybe one of the positives that can come of all of this is a re evaluation of Tesla's communications skills causing t hem problems like this.To me, due to Tesla's poor communication on the issue
To me, due to Tesla's poor communication on the issue, I don't know for sure what the actual concern with the packs is, but I am assuming it is related to the cells themselves. Therefore, in theory there would be no need to change the architecture of the pack itself. Just build new packs with updated chemistry in the cells.
Here’s something strange...what are your thoughts? My car (2015 S 85D) is currently charged to 78%, which reads 194 rated miles.
My wife uses the car very rarely, however she created a profile for herself. I just noticed when switching the profile setting between her and mine, the rated miles increased to 244, under her profile setting. When I switched back to mine, it went back to 194...a 50 mile difference. I guess I should just use her profile...lol.
Tesla has over $900,000,000 in warranty reserves. That would pay for more than 40,000 battery packs.
Does one profile use Rated and the other not?Here’s something strange...what are your thoughts? My car (2015 S 85D) is currently charged to 78%, which reads 194 rated miles.
My wife uses the car very rarely, however she created a profile for herself. I just noticed when switching the profile setting between her and mine, the rated miles increased to 244, under her profile setting. When I switched back to mine, it went back to 194...a 50 mile difference. I guess I should just use her profile...lol.
I just double checked. You’re correct. Mine is set to rated and my wife is set to ideal.Does one profile use Rated and the other not?
Has anyone said they have a pre-facelift car that is not impacted by chargegate?
The only thing you'll have in 2019.16.3 is the potential for voltage capping (range reduction) as your battery ages.I've got an 85D delievered in April 2015 with 68k miles and I haven't seen any noticeable signs of supercharging limitation or range/voltage capping. I'm still on 2019.16.3 since this entire debacle has made me leery of updates, but that should be recent enough that if my pack were at risk I'd have started seeing the signs of capping.
You should take picture and video of your range and charging speed (before and after) updates.I've got an 85D delievered in April 2015 with 68k miles and I haven't seen any noticeable signs of supercharging limitation or range/voltage capping. I'm still on 2019.16.3 since this entire debacle has made me leery of updates, but that should be recent enough that if my pack were at risk I'd have started seeing the signs of capping.
His range would already be capped in 2019.16.3 if it was going to be.You should take picture and video of your range and charging speed (before and after) updates.
The only thing you'll have in 2019.16.3 is the potential for voltage capping (range reduction) as your battery ages.
Reduced supercharger speeds came in 2019.24. Regen capping came in 2019.40
Perhaps it was. I'm not sure of the exact version. I know it wasn't in 2019.16 and was definitely in 2019.24. May have been introduced somewhere in between.I thought Supercharger restriction was in 2019.20.4.2? Or is that just a Typo by me?