Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla Supercharger network

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Reasonable disagreement. I mentioned Fresno only in case you had missed it. But it seems pretty unambiguous now -- there's a decent chance Fresno will be operational in 2015!

Based upon my conversation with the construction crew, their jobs will be complete some time before Christmas--maybe around the 12th-15th, but do not hold me to this estimate.

However, there will be that very minor detail of supplying electricity to the stalls. No telling when the monolithic PG&E will decide to install the transformer. Didn't we wait about six weeks last January for PG&E to install the transformer at Manteca?
 
San Clemente SC SEVERELY overloaded Saturday 4:30 PM

We were returning from San Diego to Orange County and pulled into the San Clemente SC yesterday since my estimated remaining battery to my home was only 2% because of an unexpected side trip. When we pulled in EVERY Supercharger slot was full with 4 cars waiting... and nowhere for us to park & wait for a spot.

This is the first time I've pulled into a SC where every stall was full so I was quite surprised. Sure would have been nice if the Tesla Nav had told us every stall was full before we pulled off the freeway to the SC. Fortunately I was able to get home with 2% remaining by turning on Range Mode and reducing my freeway speed significantly... Down to 50 mph on the last big hill on the 73 freeway by the Newport Coast toll booth.

Sure seems like the San Clemente SC station needs more SC stations AND parking spaces for a SC queue.

Anybody else have this happen here? If so what day & time?
 
Bet you had to wait quite a while. It may not make you feel much better, but there has not been an empty SpC slot ever in Alaska, Yukon, 99 percent of BC or Alberta; Saskatchewan....we've got about two million square miles where our wait is one hellacious lot longer than yours....just something to throw a little perspective.
 
...we've got about two million square miles where our wait is one hellacious lot longer than yours....just something to throw a little perspective.

Well, to put the perspective in perspective, what's relevant is the length of major roads rather than the area of the state. I imagine a total of maybe 8-10 superchargers would cover all of Alaska quite nicely. And given the number of Teslas in Alaska, starting with two stalls per location would about cover it. What do you think?
 
Well, to put the perspective in perspective, what's relevant is the length of major roads rather than the area of the state. I imagine a total of maybe 8-10 superchargers would cover all of Alaska quite nicely. And given the number of Teslas in Alaska, starting with two stalls per location would about cover it. What do you think?

I think AudobonB's point is that your 8-10 superchargers to cover all of Alaska is 8-10 superchargers more than they have now.
 
Updated (again) "Coming Soon" and "2015" Superchargers

Tesla updated the 2015 North American supercharger map again today, and unlike the map available only on November 18th this one actually makes sense. The "2015" tab shows 14 of the "Coming Soon" superchargers which Tesla thinks will actually open this year. Some of these are not yet confirmed under construction, so if anyone passes through any of the following cities please stop at the site and report back to TMC: Ukiah CA, Colorado Springs CO, Victoria TX, Lexington VA, Tannersville PA, Port Hope ON (site unknown). Besides Port Hope, the other Coming Soon sites whose locations are not yet known are Jackson MS, Champaign IL, Terre Haute IN, DC Suburbs MD, Erie PA, Harrisburg PA, and Hampton Bays NY.

LocationSite Known?Status
Burbank, CA (on 2015 map)yesawaiting transformer installation
Buttonwillow, CAyesin permitting
Crescent City, CAyesin permitting
Eureka, CAyesin permitting
Fresno, CA
yesin permitting
Mammoth Lakes, CAyesin permitting
Napa, CA (on 2015 map)yesunder construction
Ukiah, CA (on 2015 map)
yesin permitting
Beatty, NV (on 2015 map)
yesawaiting transformer / hookup
Colorado Springs, CO (on 2015 map)
yesin permitting
Lindale, TX
yes
in design or permitting
Victoria, TX (on 2015 map)
yesin permitting or under construction
Slidell, LAyeswaiting for other construction
Jackson, MSnounknown
Champaign, ILnounknown
Terre Haute, INnounknown
Cadillac, MIyesoperational
Louisville, KY (on 2015 map)
yesin permitting or under construction
Asheville, NC (on 2015 map)
yesunder construction
Plantation, FL (on 2015 map)
yesawaiting transformer
Lexington, VA (on 2015 map)
yes
permit issued
Wytheville, VAyes
permit issued
D.C. Suburbs, MDnounknown
Erie, PA
nounknown
Harrisburg, PAnounknown
South Whitehall, PAyesin permitting
Tannersville, PA (on 2015 map)
yesin permitting
Hampton Bays, NYnounknown
Augusta, ME (on 2015 map)
yesunder construction
Kelowna, BC (on 2015 map)
yesawaiting transformer / hookup
Port Hope, ON (on 2015 map)
nounknown
Following are additional sites not on the Coming Soon or 2015 lists:
Fremont (Kato Road), CA
yes
under construction
Placerville, CA
yesunknown
Santa Barbara, CAyesin permitting
Temecula, CAnounknown
Bowling Green, KYnoin permitting
Tonopah, NVyesin site agreement negotiations
Catoosa, OKyessite agreement completed
Rivière-du-Loup, QCyesin permitting
 
Tesla updated the 2015 North American supercharger map again today, and unlike the map available only on November 18th this one actually makes sense. The "2015" tab shows 14 of the "Coming Soon" superchargers which Tesla thinks will actually open this year. Some of these are not yet confirmed under construction, so if anyone passes through any of the following cities please stop at the site and report back to TMC: Ukiah CA, Colorado Springs CO, Victoria TX, Lexington VA, Tannersville PA, Port Hope ON (site unknown). Besides Port Hope, the other Coming Soon sites whose locations are not yet known are Jackson MS, Champaign IL, Terre Haute IN, DC Suburbs MD, Erie PA, Harrisburg PA, and Hampton Bays NY.

Thanks for the great summary! For those who want to look at the high res originals of these maps, they are at:

 
I disagree with supercharge.info on this one. I think the construction shown here may just be the ATM & clock tower being installed next to the supercharger site. I'll believe it when I see conduit, Tesla crates, or something else specific to superchargers.

Update as of about a week ago: Fresno, CA really is under construction, there is at least one picture of Tesla crates, etc. over in the thread.
 
sorry if I am asking questions that have already been asked elsewhere, but now that we are starting to make supercharger trips I am interested in what people think are best practices: is it better to charge in two superchargers along a route for ten minutes each, or to try and "skip" one supercharger and charge for 20 minutes in the second supercharger? in my experience skipping one sometimes requires driving slower to make sure one can make it. One example of this is along I35, I am currently sitting at the Denton SC going north. Should I stop at Ardmore or try to make it to Oklahoma City? Any useful rules of thumb for this? Is the route planner reliable? on the way down it said "you have enough charge to make it to your next stop" but the weather was bad and it was too close, we had to slow down to make sure we made it.

thanks!
 
sorry if I am asking questions that have already been asked elsewhere, but now that we are starting to make supercharger trips I am interested in what people think are best practices: is it better to charge in two superchargers along a route for ten minutes each, or to try and "skip" one supercharger and charge for 20 minutes in the second supercharger? in my experience skipping one sometimes requires driving slower to make sure one can make it. One example of this is along I35, I am currently sitting at the Denton SC going north. Should I stop at Ardmore or try to make it to Oklahoma City? Any useful rules of thumb for this? Is the route planner reliable? on the way down it said "you have enough charge to make it to your next stop" but the weather was bad and it was too close, we had to slow down to make sure we made it.

thanks!

I stop at Ardmore. Charges are faster if you're not trying to skip.
 
sorry if I am asking questions that have already been asked elsewhere, but now that we are starting to make supercharger trips I am interested in what people think are best practices: is it better to charge in two superchargers along a route for ten minutes each, or to try and "skip" one supercharger and charge for 20 minutes in the second supercharger? in my experience skipping one sometimes requires driving slower to make sure one can make it. One example of this is along I35, I am currently sitting at the Denton SC going north. Should I stop at Ardmore or try to make it to Oklahoma City? Any useful rules of thumb for this? Is the route planner reliable? on the way down it said "you have enough charge to make it to your next stop" but the weather was bad and it was too close, we had to slow down to make sure we made it.

thanks!

There are two things that influence time. Getting off the freeway and back on will usually cost you a little bit of time. If it's close by it might be just 5 min. If it's really off, it can add 20 min (like in St George). The other thing to consider is state of charge. The higher the state of charge, the slower the Supercharger. I wrote about the effect of it here How to save a lot of time on long trips

Trying to charge all the way and skipping a Supercharger usually ends up taking longer than stopping and charging in between.
 
sorry if I am asking questions that have already been asked elsewhere, but now that we are starting to make supercharger trips I am interested in what people think are best practices: is it better to charge in two superchargers along a route for ten minutes each, or to try and "skip" one supercharger and charge for 20 minutes in the second supercharger? in my experience skipping one sometimes requires driving slower to make sure one can make it. One example of this is along I35, I am currently sitting at the Denton SC going north. Should I stop at Ardmore or try to make it to Oklahoma City? Any useful rules of thumb for this? Is the route planner reliable? on the way down it said "you have enough charge to make it to your next stop" but the weather was bad and it was too close, we had to slow down to make sure we made it.

thanks!

Generally speaking, your car will charge faster the lower the SOC is when you start charging. A strategy I've seen stated somewhere else is to arrive at a SC with about 10% SOC, or whatever buffer you feel comfortable with, and only charge enough to arrive at the next SC with the same SOC. The "Trip" tab on the Energy display will show you how well you are tracking the route planner's estimated energy use and what SOC it thinks you'll arrive with. If you find that you are falling below the graph at any time, you should slow down or maybe draft that 18-wheeler that is going fast enough for you. (I don't have TACC or Autopilot hardware, but I'll bet it does a good job of drafting.) :)
 
There are two things that influence time. Getting off the freeway and back on will usually cost you a little bit of time. If it's close by it might be just 5 min. If it's really off, it can add 20 min (like in St George). The other thing to consider is state of charge. The higher the state of charge, the slower the Supercharger. I wrote about the effect of it here How to save a lot of time on long trips

Trying to charge all the way and skipping a Supercharger usually ends up taking longer than stopping and charging in between.

thank you for the link, nice write up!
 
Update including November 18th, 2015:

North America
2012: 0 + 0 + 2 + 7 = 9
2013: 0 + 2 + 11 + 28 = 41
2014: 32 + 16 + 19 + 35 = 102
2015: 42 + 19 + 22 + 18 = 101
Total: 9 + 41 + 102 + 101 = 253

Europe
2013: 0 + 0 + 6 + 8 = 14
2014: 0 + 10 + 44 + 54 = 108
2015: 19 + 19 + 32 + 9 = 79
Total: 14 + 108 + 79 = 201

Asia Pacific (Currently: China, Japan, Australia)
2014: 0 + 3 + 16 + 39 = 58
2015: 15 + 5 + 15 + 11 = 46
Total: 58 + 46 = 104

Global total: 253 + 201 + 104 = 558

2012 Global total: 9 + 0 + 0 = 9
2013 Global total: 41 + 14 + 0 = 55
2014 Global total: 102 + 108 + 58 = 268
2015 Global total so far: 101 + 79 + 46 = 226

Q1 2013 total: 0 + 0 + 0 = 0
Q2 2013 total: 2 + 0 + 0 = 2
Q3 2013 total: 11 + 6 + 0 = 17
Q4 2013 total: 28 + 8 + 0 = 36

Q1 2014 total: 32 + 0 + 0 = 32
Q2 2014 total: 16 + 10 + 3 = 29
Q3 2014 total: 19 + 44 + 16 = 79
Q4 2014 total: 35 + 54 + 39 = 128

H1 2014: 32 + 29 = 61
H2 2014: 79 + 128 = 207

Q1 2015 total: 42 + 19 + 15 = 76
Q2 2015 total: 19 + 19 + 5 = 43
Q3 2015 total: 22 + 32 + 15 = 69 (in 92 days)
Q4 2015 (so far): 18 + 9 + 11 = 38 (in 49 days)

H1 2015: 76 + 43 = 119 (in 181 days)
H2 2015 (so far): 40 + 41 + 26 = 107 (in 141 days)

"226 new live Supercharger stations in 322 days (in 2015). The average is more than 0.7018 per day (in 2015)". That looks like the going average these days. The average in 2014 was 0.7342 (= 268/365). And that still is extraordinary progress, although the average in 2015 (so far) is lower than the average in 2014.

Update including November 28th, 2015:

North America
2012: 0 + 0 + 2 + 7 = 9
2013: 0 + 2 + 11 + 28 = 41
2014: 32 + 16 + 19 + 35 = 102
2015: 42 + 19 + 22 + 18 = 101
Total: 9 + 41 + 102 + 101 = 253

Europe
2013: 0 + 0 + 6 + 8 = 14
2014: 0 + 10 + 44 + 54 = 108
2015: 19 + 19 + 32 + 11 = 81
Total: 14 + 108 + 81 = 203

Asia Pacific (Currently: China, Japan, Australia)
2014: 0 + 3 + 16 + 39 = 58
2015: 15 + 5 + 15 + 12 = 47
Total: 58 + 47 = 105

Global total: 253 + 203 + 105 = 561

2012 Global total: 9 + 0 + 0 = 9
2013 Global total: 41 + 14 + 0 = 55
2014 Global total: 102 + 108 + 58 = 268
2015 Global total so far: 101 + 81 + 47 = 229

Q1 2013 total: 0 + 0 + 0 = 0
Q2 2013 total: 2 + 0 + 0 = 2
Q3 2013 total: 11 + 6 + 0 = 17
Q4 2013 total: 28 + 8 + 0 = 36

Q1 2014 total: 32 + 0 + 0 = 32
Q2 2014 total: 16 + 10 + 3 = 29
Q3 2014 total: 19 + 44 + 16 = 79
Q4 2014 total: 35 + 54 + 39 = 128

H1 2014: 32 + 29 = 61
H2 2014: 79 + 128 = 207

Q1 2015 total: 42 + 19 + 15 = 76
Q2 2015 total: 19 + 19 + 5 = 43
Q3 2015 total: 22 + 32 + 15 = 69 (in 92 days)
Q4 2015 (so far): 18 + 11 + 12 = 41 (in 59 days)

H1 2015: 76 + 43 = 119 (in 181 days)
H2 2015 (so far): 40 + 43 + 27 = 110 (in 151 days)

"229 new live Supercharger stations in 332 days (in 2015). The average is more than 0.6897 per day (in 2015)". That looks like the going average these days. The average in 2014 was 0.7342 (= 268/365). And that still is extraordinary progress, although the average in 2015 (so far) is lower than the average in 2014.