I suspect that it's a Navigon issue. Living in Kamloops, at the north end of the Coq, I drive that road regularly. Things seem to change after the 'map updates' that appear once in a while. That doesn't mean they get fixed... just behave differently... LOL
My thinking is that the energy calc is done with Navigon, because an Internet connection to access Google mapping can't be guaranteed. The calc is done with known speed limits, regardless of what the camera can or cannot see on the signs. So if the known speeds are wrong, the calculation is done incorrectly too. And that's what we see on the Coq. Assumed speed limits are lower, and thus, energy consumption is lower.
Maybe one day the superchargers will have a wifi connection to ensure the latest information can be provided to the car for routes radiating from the supercharger location. I've had some thoughts about how the cloud sourced data from the cars who've done a route before could be used to fine-tune the energy calculation... using typical driving habits, weather and temperature conditions, maybe even the assumed weight or friction loss of the car (racks on the roof could be detected by speed/energy use on previous road segments). A cloud of data could be used to fit with current expected conditions and suggest a range of energy use. It could be done - I'm sure... maybe someday.