You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm offering that since the software writing process, at Tesla, is opaque, and the manual writing process is considerably more transparent -- that one can judge the extent that the FSD is vaporware (or killerware) based on the care taken in writing straightforward English in a manual. In other words, I'm using the ability to write a correct manual as a proxy for software development at Tesla.Missile Toad,
Godspeed in your quest.
Now why are you interrupting my thread with this again?
I'm inching closer to yielding to temptation and buying a 3 or S. Like all prospective new owners, I'm grappling with the FSD option, and have decided against.
I realize many of you sprang for FSD, so I hope I'm wrong! But here fwiw is my reasoning for saving the $10K. If I'm missing something, please let me know.
The FSD pitch hints that the X factor is regulatory approval. This implies that the tech is ready - or close to it. And while many quibble with Consumer Report's take, I don't know many Tesla fans who'd claim FSB is anywhere near ready to do anything close to self-driving anytime soon. Even cute narrow novelty components like Summon seem pretty dodgy.
As for regulatory approval, I can't see it, ever, outside major highways. Balance in the ongoing war of urban drivers vs pedestrians hinges on the threat of being run over by a multi-ton hunk of metal. If urban pedestrians can stop a car cold by stepping in front of it - or waving an umbrella in its path - pedestrians "win" and driving no longer works. Even more problematic, FSD will surely choose rear-end collision over running over, say, brazen kids on skateboards. You could try to ticket jaywalkers, but that's already proven uncontrollable. So I don't see FSD in cities without massive infrastructure tweaks (e.g. raised or lowered roadways).
So...the tech's not close, regulation (beyond highways) will remain a holdup for decades, and if there's an X factor, it's the fiscal ploy behind-scenes: Tesla doesn't declare FSD income normally, allowing them to hold back that income to pad balance sheets in lean times. I'm not suggesting FSD's entirely a scam, but the accounting trick creates powerful incentive to push hopeful (and carefully disclaimered) vaporware.
Unless I'm missing something essential, I can't see spending $10K (OTOH I'm not awash in money).
Maybe its been fixed on newer cars but my 2016 Gen 2 (MCU1) has none chance of EVER being self driving. Cameras are blinded at sunrise and sunset (my commute hours) and phantom braking is SO bad that I cannot trust it for a minute. Yet I could still fork over the $8000 on their website to activate this vaporware. Hell I cant even go a week without the MCU rebooting and stranding me for 10 minutes while it recovers #lemon #FSDscam
I have been a car guy since I was born and one of the things I love is driving the car, I have no interest is FSD.
...With the advances I've seen in the beta videos and my probability of keeping the car for 8 years I paid for the $8k FSD. We'll see if it was worth it.
I try to use NoA whenever I can - mostly when my wife is NOT in the car
Nothing screams clueless like the guy who refuses to check sources...Nothing screams VAPORWARE more than, “In a recent Tweet Elon admitted that they're valuing FSD as zero dollars on a trade in.”
It stays with the car.So if I sell my car to my son in another state, does FSD come along with the car or does it go away?