Your post begs the question.
Begging the question is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it
Can you explain how pointing out the CEO of the company explicitly and repeatedly supports the claim, in writing, is "begging the question"?
Or did you not understand the phrase you were using?
Meanwhile you've offered
zero counter evidence of any kind.
I'm reacting to exactly what Musk tweets - I just pay attention to the language - unlike many. If you could link/quote your references you might be able to see my point.
no, I sure couldn't see your point since it's factually wrong.
The tweets have been reposted, by myself and others, ad nauseum at this point.
Since I'm reading what he
actually said and pointing out he's said so repeatedly and consistently, for many months now, including quite recently
While you appear to be reading what you imagine he could possibly, maybe, if you look at it crooked and ignore parts of it, "really" meant.
Y
"graphics card" is pretty close to what it is - but is meant to oversimplify to make a point that even that expectation is ambiguous, and being specific about lowers its appeal.
No, graphics card is pretty
far from what it is. If they just needed a graphics card they'd have stayed with Nvidia instead of spending a ton of time and money to build their own hardware.
That's part of the point. Folks keep trying to discuss HW3 without understanding what it even is, what it can do, and also in your case not even understanding how clearly and explicitly the CEO has repeatedly confirmed everyone who paid for FSD will get it.