Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

All discussion of Rivian Automotive

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
You have got to be kidding me: “Of Rivian’s nearly 15,000 employees, about half are focused on future products, Scaringe said”

Why? They have a golden goose in front of them and they aren’t pursuing it? Do they think their vehicles aren’t going to be competitive long term?

The engineers have already engineered the R1T, R1S, and Delivery Van. A few are re-engineering the tonneau cover.

Do you want the engineers to keep staring at R1T,R1S and Delivery Van?

Production engineers and production staff are focused on R1T,R1S and Delivery Van.
 
The engineers have already engineered the R1T, R1S, and Delivery Van. A few are re-engineering the tonneau cover.

Do you want the engineers to keep staring at R1T,R1S and Delivery Van?

Production engineers and production staff are focused on R1T,R1S and Delivery Van.

Given Munro's teardown of the R1T, while a good first product, there is plenty for the Engineers to re-do in order to lower costs and improve manufacturing throughput.
 
Given Munro's teardown of the R1T, while a good first product, there is plenty for the Engineers to re-do in order to lower costs and improve manufacturing throughput.

Exactly. The R1 platform isn't cost optimized by a long shot. Some of those engineers could also be working on securing supply chain items, like battery cells. Their self driving system needs a lot of work. And if you have too many engineers, then lay them off, don't have them designing products the company can't sell, manufacture and service properly.
 
Exactly. The R1 platform isn't cost optimized by a long shot. Some of those engineers could also be working on securing supply chain items, like battery cells. Their self driving system needs a lot of work. And if you have too many engineers, then lay them off, don't have them designing products the company can't sell, manufacture and service properly.
Rivian is working on borrowed time. Their stock price is below IPO price by a significant amount. Their big pre IPO investors are selling their stock. Rivian is not going to be able to raise money at a decent valuation unless their stock price rises, which will only happen when they are either profitable or show a strong path to get there. With half of their employees not working on anything that currently boosts revenue and/or decreases expenses one does wonder how that will happen.
 
Last edited:
The engineers have already engineered the R1T, R1S, and Delivery Van. A few are re-engineering the tonneau cover.

Do you want the engineers to keep staring at R1T,R1S and Delivery Van?

Production engineers and production staff are focused on R1T,R1S and Delivery Van.
I want them to figure out how to build more that 25,000 trucks a year. They have close to 100,000 reservations.

How many people do you think are willing to wait 4 years to get a vehicle ?

As a Rivian reservation holder I hope they get their act together sooner rather than later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cosmacelf
I had an interesting reddit discussion with an Amazon delivery fleet owner. He is rolling out seven new Rivian vans for Amazon delivery today in the Dallas region, well six since one had an electrical problem that Rivian is fixing.

I didn't realize this, but almost all Amazon logoed delivery vans you see out there aren't run by Amazon employees - they are leased from Amazon by delivery companies and it is the delivery companies that hire the delivery guys. Same thing for these Rivian delivery trucks, the delivery companies lease them from Amazon. And Amazon is leasing them out to the delivery companies at very similar rates to the Ford gas powered vans. So it would appear that between Amazon/Rivian they have figured out some subsidy scheme to electrify their delivery fleet.

Each van only gets 150 miles of range, but since the vast majority of that is start/stop, low speed urban driving, the guy I talked to said it can easily do a full package run of between 8 to 10 hours. The vans gets stocked at the Amazon hub every morning and then the drivers drive to their zone and deliver the van's worth of package for their entire shift and returns it end of day to get charged up at Amazon's hub.

Rave reviews from delivery drivers, as expected.
 
Quad motor max pack delay.

Your delivery window estimate has been updated in your Account. R1T Quad-Motor + Max pack deliveries are now planned to start in 2024. We apologize for this shift in timing and realize it is disruptive to your ability to plan. We are working hard to ramp and deliver as many vehicles as possible.

We plan to share more news on Max pack later this year, including an earlier launch for Dual Motor + Max pack with deliveries starting in Summer 2023. For the opportunity to take delivery even sooner -in some instances as early as Q1 2023-you can also reconfigure to Large pack.

If at any time you reconfigure or change your delivery address, your delivery estimate in your Account will update to "processing" pending our next scheduled refresh. We plan to refresh your estimate every three months, which means you can expect updates in January, April, July, and October of each calendar year. Moving forward, further updates to your delivery estimate will be shared in your Account.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Pricedm and MP3Mike

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221028_155106.jpg
    Screenshot_20221028_155106.jpg
    288.2 KB · Views: 51
Or perhaps most current 4-motor max-pack orders (like mine) are at the old pricing. The 2-motor version should be cheaper to make, but is the same price, so why not ship those first and make more (or at least lose less) money. Sigh.
 
Just watched the Munro video on the Rivian drivetrain. Why are the front and rear motors entirely different assemblies and part numbers but they have almost the exact same HP? Theory is they might unlock more power later, but that seems unlikely.

Seems like a big miss for getting economies of scale by using the same motor for front and rear, unless I’m missing something?
 
Just watched the Munro video on the Rivian drivetrain. Why are the front and rear motors entirely different assemblies and part numbers but they have almost the exact same HP? Theory is they might unlock more power later, but that seems unlikely.

Seems like a big miss for getting economies of scale by using the same motor for front and rear, unless I’m missing something?
You probably aren’t. Rivian has a long way to go to figure out cost optimization. The front door assembly has something like 100 screws! Hopefully for the company, they will continuously cost optimize like Tesla and not be stuck in model year thinking like legacy auto.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Todd Burch
Just watched the Munro video on the Rivian drivetrain. Why are the front and rear motors entirely different assemblies and part numbers but they have almost the exact same HP? Theory is they might unlock more power later, but that seems unlikely.

Seems like a big miss for getting economies of scale by using the same motor for front and rear, unless I’m missing something?

Teslas have different front and rear motors as well. Eg in model Y rear motor is a switched reluctance permanent magnet motor, front is induction motor.

Induction motors can coast when you're driving and don't need awd, so this way is more efficient than using the same motors.
 
Just watched the Munro video. Why are the front and rear motors entirely different assemblies but they have almost the exact same HP? Theory is they might unlock more power later, but that seems unlikely.

Seems like a big miss for getting economies of scale by using the same motor for front and rear, unless I’m missing something
Teslas have different front and rear motors as well. Eg in model Y rear motor is a switched reluctance permanent magnet motor, front is induction motor.

Induction motors can coast when you're driving and don't need awd, so this way is more efficient than using the same motors.
Yes, but those are different for a reason. Maybe I missed it (admittedly I didn’t watch 100% of the video) but I didn’t hear that Rivian’s motors are fundamentally different front to rear.
 
Yes, but those are different for a reason. Maybe I missed it (admittedly I didn’t watch 100% of the video) but I didn’t hear that Rivian’s motors are fundamentally different front to rear.
The biggest difference I saw is that the rear motors have the axel uncoupling feature/module so that they can be disconnected for efficiency while the truck runs in FWD mode.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: KBF and bkp_duke