stopcrazypp
Well-Known Member
For some reason TMC is having problems and ate my post, but here it is again.@stopcrazypp There's a gaping hole in your logic. Because the state of California says that the report does not include any testing performed off public California roads does not mean that Tesla actually did testing off public California roads. If, in fact, they did other testing, then one has to wonder why it took 500 miles on public roads with 177 disengagements to make this brief video. This video was represented to buyers and the public as Tesla Vision, not "advertising." I have a car with Tesla Vision that does less than 1% of what is shown in that video.
I'm not saying just because it does not include off CA testing that it is solid evidence that they must have done testing elsewhere, but rather stories that overfocus on the CA autonomous testing report is inherently misleading because it suggests that this is the full extent (or substantial extent) of testing that Tesla did. This leads to possible outrage as you seem to be having.
My point is mainly it is simply common sense that it is not just that few days of public road driving to get to the point of the Tesla video.
As for interpretation of the video, it seems very clear to me that it is showing FSD, which Tesla did not have a explicit timetable for release at the time (regulatory approval is a huge variable and it's still very early in the development stage). I'm pretty sure that is how most people interpreted it also.
The video title itself says Self-Driving. No mention of EAP (EAP certainly is not self-driving).
Tesla Self-Driving Demonstration
Last edited: