No, it's not. Not by a long shot. A teen on their first day wouldn't do some of the stuff I've seen mine do.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
FSD v12.x (end to end AI)
- Thread starter Buckminster
- Start date
-
- Tags
- #fixphantombraking autopilot chill is not chill elon is an ass fix fsd extreme late deceleration fsd does not commit to go fsd does not maintain proper speed fsd hard and late braking fsd jerky driving fsd late deceleration fsd stops too early too quickly fsd stops too far behind line fsd tailgating in city streets
jebinc
Well-Known Member
Do you know how many people here would stand up and cheer if this was released
AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
This proves Elon right; it doesn’t know what a stop sign is. End to end FTW.
Good thing nobody told Seymor Cray that…
Are you using the time from light going yellow to deceleration to extrapolate that the car would rear end a lead car?
The car didn't need to hit the brakes instantaneously and doing so would increase its chances of being rear ended. It was going 21 and appeared to stop in plenty of time/ distance.
Would be nice to have 360 camera view in the vidro...
Sorry, I didn't see an emoji to help me out thereI was being factious! Everyone knows I think it’s junk… well, almost everyone!
Quite likely. Karpathy said years ago there were collecting samples of non-signalled cut ins.
It's one thing to be an early researcher of computer architectures and entirely different to be a publicly traded company trying to vertically integrate. As TSLA fails, the NVDA machine keeps optimizing more and more powerful solutions.
Are you talking about the M1 personal computer microprocessor?
AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
I agree one has to think about an instant reaction. But flying toward a light with no slowing and with reaction much slower than a human, then slamming the brakes, clearly increases risk. It’s exactly the scenario which results in rear ending because the person behind may think you have committed to go and unwisely try to follow through, possibly accelerating.
But change to 0.5 sec reaction time (slow end for an human) and you end up with 0.38g stop which is tolerable rather than one which exceeded 0.6g (14mph in 1 sec), and averaged 0.48g - a very abrupt stop.
It’s a big difference.
Omar specifically said the person behind expected him to go.
Obviously the correct decision was to go, too. (Certainly would have entered intersection on yellow as legally required. Could do more work with distances to determine if could have crossed intersection before turning red - I think possibly, but it doesn’t matter.)
Last edited:
jabloomf1230
Minister of Silly Walks
jabloomf1230
Minister of Silly Walks
Why doesn't Apple have any supercomputers? Is it because they don't need them or because they haven't invested in one yet, despite their ...
Answer (1 of 2): A lot of the need for supercomputers has faded. Apple had a Cray supercomputer in the 1980s to help it model plastics flow when doing case design and some airflow for designing cooling systems that moved heat and were “less loud”. A regular desktop or even laptop can do that as ...
FSDtester#1
Craves Electrolytes
Just so everyone that doesn't know here. @mongo Is one of the best contributors on TMC and has been for years. He speaks from tons of research and knowledge. When he posts here, take a minute to respond if you disagree.
In years of my experience, he is almost never wrong.
Nice to see you buddy!
I was referring to the Bionic chips used in the iphones as well as the Macbooks. they moved away from IBM & Intel and built their own.Why doesn't Apple have any supercomputers? Is it because they don't need them or because they haven't invested in one yet, despite their ...
Answer (1 of 2): A lot of the need for supercomputers has faded. Apple had a Cray supercomputer in the 1980s to help it model plastics flow when doing case design and some airflow for designing cooling systems that moved heat and were “less loud”. A regular desktop or even laptop can do that as ...www.quora.com
AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
Actually g force could be even lower due to the extra distance.
Compare stopping from 21 mph in 31ft, vs 45ft starting at 21mph if you start slowing half second earlier.
So if you start stopping 0.5sec earlier you can actually take 0.5sec longer to stop. For a total of 3 seconds.
So at 0.31g you cover 45 feet in 3 seconds.
Vs. what happened which is (roughly;deceleration was not uniform) slowing from 21mph to 0 in 2 seconds over 31 feet which is 0.48g (as mentioned peak was higher which means stopping distance was probably less than 31 feet).
Starting the stop earlier is very helpful!
0.3g is much more tolerable than a best-case ~0.5g. (Which actually peaked at 0.6g.)
Poor road markings is a problem here too, for all drivers (computer and human.) They fade away too fast between the new environmentally safer paint and the use of road salt.
But I bet Boston will be a HUGE problem for AV because of the tendency of the drivers there to stop to allow pedestrians to cross. I found that if I was standing still at a corner, checking a tourist map, I needed to stand with my back to the road or else the drivers would stop to let me cross!
KArnold
Active Member
I only drove Boston once when on a business trip. I'm not sure what those boxes on each corner were with red, yellow, and green lights were as nobody gave them any regard. Concluded they were simply decorations.
Similar threads
- Article
