You don't need to get the top of the line to get the bigger battery. Cybertruck is still vaporware. Tesla over-promises / under delivers on range, historically. This <F150 Lightning> truck will sell like hotcakes
Since Ford and Tesla are both building the factories to produce the vehicles, and none are for sale from either currently both are so called vapor eh?
Re: range, I have reservations on both, and it is very clear from everything Ford+Tesla had posted that the Lightning will be
far off the top range of the Tesla truck.
Real life range matters, our 2013 Model S can achieve 90%+ EPA range today on that cycle, 8.5 years later, with degradation, that kind of excellent engineering is what I expect of Tesla.
Ford Mach-e is very inefficient, and therefore I expect the Lightning to be similarly poor, but that just means the Lightning will need a massive battery pack to get either 230 or 300 miles range. Therefore, the Lightning will do well in relative terms on towing tests because the kWh matters for towing more than any other metric. Air resistance will reduce the range as a function of kWh, independent of how efficient the tow vehicle is without a trailer.
So, in an irony, Ford may do "better" on how much range is lost due to towing, but only because it is so poorly optimized compared to a Cybertruck which has aero advantages (vault cover, shape, Tesla motor and battery tech, etc).
It will not be possible for Ford to make back a deficit in kWh to the top end Cybertruck WRT towing range. If the tri motor trim has more kWh than the 300 mile Lightning, it is crystal clear which truck will tow the furthest on a charge.
When it comes to charging on the road, Ford loses, about 1/2 the effective speed in kWh added per time based on Mach-e vs Tesla charging videos posted online.