Sup3rt3sla
Member
"Update" on the class action: They want to continue discussions and are asking the court to stay the case until after their next scheduled update on December 15th.
What a surprise ...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Update" on the class action: They want to continue discussions and are asking the court to stay the case until after their next scheduled update on December 15th.
Too much talk, no action."Update" on the class action: They want to continue discussions and are asking the court to stay the case until after their next scheduled update on December 15th.
Here rumors about credits being given to customers in Feb 2021 who needed to do MCU1 repairs and extending the warranty to 8 years on those items. Will be interesting to hear what happens after all the discussions.Tesla is playing a waiting game. But the class action suit will go beyond our warranty periods? Maybe they are hoping the longer it drags out, the smaller our class action group will get?
Here rumors about credits being given to customers in Feb 2021 who needed to do MCU1 repairs and extending the warranty to 8 years on those items. Will be interesting to hear what happens after all the discussions.
For sure. Last month mine bricked the display. Had to have it flat-bed towed to the SC 5 hours away at MY expense. It was the EMMC card, of course. Had to pay for the fix as well. It pissed me off that the 64G ones were out of stock Tjhen I had to rent a car to get to the SC to pick up my Tessie. NOT amused. And as far as not affecting the driveability, I call BS. Hard to know what level to charge to if you have no nav or maps and cannot even turn off the AC (which was stuck on low temp, max fan). Other needed functions were also offline. The SC advised me NOT to attempt to drive it the 5 hours to the SC for my safety.Not a rumor
Our records show that you own, or previously owned, a Model S/X that was built before March 2018. It may be eligible for Tesla’s Warranty Adjustment Program covering malfunction of a memory chip (embedded MultiMediaCard). This malfunction may result in a blank or intermittently blank touchscreen but will not impact the ability to drive your car.
Tesla is providing eligible owners who experience a malfunction no-cost repairs to this part at any Tesla Service Center for 8 years/100k miles from initial delivery date. If you do not experience a malfunction, there’s no need to take action.
If you have already paid for repairs that meet the conditions of the program, you may be eligible for reimbursement. Tesla will send reimbursement details and eligibility by February 2021.
Should be a recall item not an extended warranty item.
Agree.For sure. Last month mine bricked the display. Had to have it flat-bed towed to the SC 5 hours away at MY expense. It was the EMMC card, of course. Had to pay for the fix as well. It pissed me off that the 64G ones were out of stock Tjhen I had to rent a car to get to the SC to pick up my Tessie. NOT amused. And as far as not affecting the driveability, I call BS. Hard to know what level to charge to if you have no nav or maps and cannot even turn off the AC (which was stuck on low temp, max fan). Other needed functions were also offline. The SC advised me NOT to attempt to drive it the 5 hours to the SC for my safety.
The above notice it meaningless CRAP to MOST of the affected users, since most are past the 100,000 miles limit.
Seems to me like a fluff piece for the media. They need to remove the limit, reimburse everyone who had it done, and install the RIGHT 64G card.
What other ... Ahem... Rumors can you share?Here rumors about credits being given to customers in Feb 2021 who needed to do MCU1 repairs and extending the warranty to 8 years on those items. Will be interesting to hear what happens after all the discussions.
Seems to me like
fluff piece for the media.
Got email from Tesla about that yesterday.Here rumors about credits being given to customers in Feb 2021 who needed to do MCU1 repairs and extending the warranty to 8 years on those items. Will be interesting to hear what happens after all the discussions.
Sorry that you had that much trouble. Hopefully they will reimburse you in full. It's really unacceptable that a few $ part cripples computer and consequently the car. There should be more redundancy built in. It does affect the driving - you get no access to lights, blinker's not working, HVAC, if soonroof is open, you can forget about closing it, then there is fart game not working - sorry, if they consider it important enough to put in release notes while not putting anything about critical pieces, then it must be extremely importantFor sure. Last month mine bricked the display. Had to have it flat-bed towed to the SC 5 hours away at MY expense. It was the EMMC card, of course. Had to pay for the fix as well. It pissed me off that the 64G ones were out of stock Tjhen I had to rent a car to get to the SC to pick up my Tessie. NOT amused. And as far as not affecting the driveability, I call BS. Hard to know what level to charge to if you have no nav or maps and cannot even turn off the AC (which was stuck on low temp, max fan). Other needed functions were also offline. The SC advised me NOT to attempt to drive it the 5 hours to the SC for my safety.
The above notice it meaningless CRAP to MOST of the affected users, since most are past the 100,000 miles limit.
Seems to me like a fluff piece for the media. They need to remove the limit, reimburse everyone who had it done, and install the RIGHT 64G card.
According to reports in German TFF Forum, the displayed range rose to the old values, slowly over the last months, a few km every week.
But the reported usable capacity in kWh did not move a single Wh up, according to ScanMyTesla.
Final cell voltage is still at 4,1V, but range shows the value before 2019.16. (minus a few % for degradation which is totally acceptable after 1.5 years).
So it looks like Tesla changed the calculation for available range w/o really increasing range or giving back usable battery capacity.
Akku-Kapazität (70/85-er) gesunken nach Update 2019.16.2
/Edit: there are also reports that usable capacity did rise hand in hand with displayed range to old kWh values gradually over the last few months.
My numbers consistently changed back. I reported so in this post from October 10th:Looks like inconsistent reporting by owners. My numbers have not changed at all.
Happy to see the changes in my car's charging pattern in comparison to 14 months ago.
Extra info: I had the CCS 2 Combo adapter installed and have used it a couple of times. Not sure this has any bearing on this behavior, just mentioning it.
- current software version 2020.36.11
- charging speed has remained similar, but starts out at 'normal'maximum of 115 kW
- 100% SoC is now 369 km, which is pretty much what is was before BatteryGate.
- calculation still seems to be done with 200 Wh/km
For sure. Last month mine bricked the display. Had to have it flat-bed towed to the SC 5 hours away at MY expense. It was the EMMC card, of course. Had to pay for the fix as well. It pissed me off that the 64G ones were out of stock Tjhen I had to rent a car to get to the SC to pick up my Tessie. NOT amused. And as far as not affecting the driveability, I call BS. Hard to know what level to charge to if you have no nav or maps and cannot even turn off the AC (which was stuck on low temp, max fan). Other needed functions were also offline. The SC advised me NOT to attempt to drive it the 5 hours to the SC for my safety.
The above notice it meaningless CRAP to MOST of the affected users, since most are past the 100,000 miles limit.
Seems to me like a fluff piece for the media. They need to remove the limit, reimburse everyone who had it done, and install the RIGHT 64G card.
Are these symptoms of eMMC failure, or it's just bad memory management?
I don't want to derail battery discussion ... or point to most applicable thread about eMMC
Isn't this exactly what Tesla did remotely?This is what Tesla should have done all along. Safety should always come before secrecy.
Yet Tesla knew a Vmax of 4.15V would be better back when they were building the 1st-gen Roadsters.Secretly try to avoid doing the right thing by notifying owners through the only legally approved notification process they are allowed to handle a downgrade of this magnitude while more permanent safety solutions are worked out? Yes, that's how Tesla tried to conceal problem and avoid all legal safety processes. Tesla chose secrecy and avoided safety. Failure to notify *anyone* is why so many people are still on danger from what Tesla failed to do - and more people are still downgrading since there has yet to be any legal disclosure.