Despite nearly 15k posts, I'm not sure there is a definitive statement as to exactly why the charge rate cap was imposed, why some cars seem to have reverted to higher rates, why non-updated cars have not been formally required to run with rate reducing / testing firmware and if similar rate caps are applied universally given the detection of certain indicators.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Wiki Sudden Loss Of Range With 2019.16.x Software
- Thread starter Dutchmeeuw
- Start date
Despite nearly 15k posts, I'm not sure there is a definitive statement as to exactly why the charge rate cap was imposed, why some cars seem to have reverted to higher rates, why non-updated cars have not been formally required to run with rate reducing / testing firmware and if similar rate caps are applied universally given the detection of certain indicators.
What cars have reverted to higher rates????????????????????? Are there any 85's charging higher than 110 = SOC + KW?
To be precise, owners say they see charging rates higher.
I will try and find posts to quote, but I am basing my comment on what I have read on TMC.
I agree that the more common experience and sentiment for the future is that capped rates remain in place.
My 90D had the max charge rate restored in 2020.48.37.1, except the aggressive taper is still in place. I went from a max of 94kw rate to 124.
For more than 30 seconds?
The initial peak is still at >120kW, but tapers off to 110-SoC in a few seconds.
Yes, it's not much.
Is there any better data than this from Teslalogger?: From late 2020.
85
P85D
You could extract the raw data and filter it yourself.
Which additional filters do you need?
Hi! I'm trying to filter the Teslalogger charging data by multiple selections to include all the different 85 variants: 85, 85D, P85, P85+ P85D. Perhaps there is a possibility to add filters for Firmwareversions to exclude and multiple selections via URL?
I am waiting for a local SuC to be opened to start a series of tests to establish the current state of capacity and charge speeds. Looking into the docker/synology integration for that.
Nevertheless, I am wondering whether there is an easy way to show the time to add a certain amount of Energy added to the battery? Comparing charge speed per SoC seems to ignore the actual degradation of an individual battery.
Best regards! Oaito.
airborne spoon
Active Member
My car has not been nerfed on the speed but it has been nerfed on range and the SC curve.
At 4% I hit 128kW but by the time i get to 20% I'm down to 92kW and at 60% I'm AT 40Kw
before all this crap i would be at 50% and 72kW, but now 50% is 51kW
2014 P85D with 2021.4.18 currently
Any update on the lawsuit Rasmussen v Tesla regarding this matter?
This August it will be 3 years since the initial filing of the lawsuit.
The original attorney, Edward Chen, dropped out in 2020 and the new attorney is Nimish R. Desai of the law firm
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein.
This August it will be 3 years since the initial filing of the lawsuit.
The original attorney, Edward Chen, dropped out in 2020 and the new attorney is Nimish R. Desai of the law firm
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein.
The latest updates to the case are here. But you have to buy the details at this website.
www.courtlistener.com
There was a hearing May 5th and I called Nimish Desai to get an update but he never returned my calls.
If owners involved in this lawsuit here would keep calling Nimish Desai (number below) maybe he'll start sending updates to all the plaintiffs.
415-956-1000
.
Rasmussen v. Tesla, Inc., 5:19-cv-04596 - CourtListener.com
Docket for Rasmussen v. Tesla, Inc., 5:19-cv-04596 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
There was a hearing May 5th and I called Nimish Desai to get an update but he never returned my calls.
If owners involved in this lawsuit here would keep calling Nimish Desai (number below) maybe he'll start sending updates to all the plaintiffs.
415-956-1000
.
Tesla facing potential $162M fine in Norway over throttled Model S charging speeds
Tesla could be forced to pay $162 million to Tesla owners in Norway following a preliminary judgement against the automaker.
driveteslacanada.ca
Went from “potential” to “official”.Tesla facing potential $162M fine in Norway over throttled Model S charging speeds
Tesla could be forced to pay $162 million to Tesla owners in Norway following a preliminary judgement against the automaker.
I hope those of us in the states are also compensated.
Norway fines Tesla for reducing battery capacities and charging speeds
A court in Norway has found Tesla guilty after it was sued by owners who complained of reduced battery capacities and charging speeds.
www.engadget.com
sdoorex
Member
Looks like Tesla failed to respond to the court in a timely manner and by default lost. Did Elon fire the legal affairs team along with the PR team?
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
I assume they'll file an appeal, unless they think it's cheaper to just pay the fine to the 30 owners.
Went from “potential” to “official”.
I hope those of us in the states are also compensated.
Norway fines Tesla for reducing battery capacities and charging speeds
A court in Norway has found Tesla guilty after it was sued by owners who complained of reduced battery capacities and charging speeds.
Hi! Besides being interesting, the "judgment" is based on the maximum fine possibly with this low level court. There are several higher instances, IMHO Tesla will probably go through all of them, allowing to stretch the process for each instance over many, many months resulting in years until a final decision. So, the "good" news is far from being final.
BR! Oaito.
Similar threads
