You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My delivery pushed back second time, now
Recent Nissan Leafs, Audi E-tron, Jaguar IPace, Mercedes EQC to start. I think that even the new Vauxhall eCorsa uses a reverse cycle system. I think that Tesla is one of the few still using resistive heating, but it may be for a very good reason, since Tesla are also one of the most efficient EVs on the market!
I believe the Jaguar iPace uses a heat pump, so I guess it's poor overall range is caused by some other inefficiency.
some other inefficiency
Hmm, I disagree. A purely resistive heater will have an efficiency of about 1 all the time; a heat pump may have a coefficient of performance of say 5 in moderate temperature gradients, reducing as the temperature delta rises. However, the COP can't ever get lower than 1 in theory, because any energy used by the compressor will still eventually be delivered as heat.Yep, heat pumps are definitely more efficient than resistive heating down to 0°C or just below, but at colder temperatures resistive will be more efficient.
Lead likes to be kept full but from what I understand the 12V battery in Tesla gets constantly full cycled, so it does not just sit full. And from the forum posts even if you do not drive the car, the cameras and electronics cycle the battery couple of times a day. So it gets charged from main battery pack when it falls below set charge, then charged until full and then used until needs charge again. So most of the time it is somewhere between full and empty. Since Lithium can do way more full cycles than Lead based battery, this would work perfectly with Lithium and since Lithium does not want to sit at full or empty they can just set the charge start to say 10% and full charge limit to 90% and the battery will be a happy camper.Lead-acids like being kept full, so they will have a long and comfortable life, apart from the odd total failure.
Hmm, I disagree. A purely resistive heater will have an efficiency of about 1 all the time; a heat pump may have a coefficient of performance of say 5 in moderate temperature gradients, reducing as the temperature delta rises. However, the COP can't ever get lower than 1 in theory, because any energy used by the compressor will still eventually be delivered as heat.
Certainly there's no physical reason why a heat pump can't work below 273K, which is an entirely arbitrary value we just happen to be familiar with; after all, when you make liquid nitrogen or any other cryogenic substance, you're using a heat pump to pump heat out, and you're able to reach very low temperatures.
The theoretical efficiency of a heat pump is related to the temperature difference you're 'pumping against', and the absolute temperature (like Carnot efficiency for heat engines, it's largely equivalent).
A heat pump may become less effective, though, outside of its design temperature range; depending on the working fluid, complications like ice formation (i.e. insulation) on the heat source, and so forth. It may be that the output (and input) goes to near zero when the working fluid no longer evaporates or whatever, but that's not the same as efficiency.
I am kinda disappointed in the way the Tesla manages heat, but I'll just have to accept that the various bits I'd have done differently have indeed been carefully considered and it just wasn't worth doing the way I'd have done. Aside from the lack of ability to heat the cabin with a heat pump, another example is the lack of ability to use waste drive-train heat in the cabin (https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/posts/3897624/); I might guess that under conditions where you would want cabin heating, there's no (or very rarely) "spare" drive-train heat available (presumably during Supercharging we don't care about efficiency and are happy to use the resistive heater...).
Anyway... I'm just going to have to get over worrying about every last bit of efficiency, especially in relation to Tesla's notoriously bad vampire drain.
My White P3D+ is ready and being given to someone else apparently, I have received nothing from Tesla since ordering and being a Day 1 Reservation has clearly meant nothing as reservations 2 years later are getting allocated the same car in SydneyI just gave Tesla a poke and got this reply:
"
The delivery team are currently working on thousands of deliveries and there are a lot of moving pieces involved but they will definitely be in touch when your Model 3 is ready.
They will typically reach out with 7 – 10 days’ notice to schedule your delivery date and issue your final invoice.
"
from what I understand the 12V battery in Tesla gets constantly full cycled
Thousands?? Wow! There must be plenty of orders now! Last estimate I heard was 2500 orders.The delivery team are currently working on thousands of deliveries
I'm interested because I'll likely be out in winter all night in cold conditions and likely car camping etc at a significant distance from charging..
Given the early reservationists are sitting on 3.5 year wait it does seem to be lacking in fairnessreservations 2 years later