strago13
Member
Rough math is about 4k carsImpressive amount of Tesla vehicles at Shanghai port. Wu Wa video here: Wu Wa Video
View attachment 834203
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rough math is about 4k carsImpressive amount of Tesla vehicles at Shanghai port. Wu Wa video here: Wu Wa Video
View attachment 834203
And that's how the sauce is made.
The 7kWh provision appears to be pandering direct to Manchin. I wonder how much Toyota contributes to his campaign . . .
oe Manchin (D-WVa) | $8,000 |
I think the systems will be a bit more than $1k to add in, but overall I think you are spot on, that significant profit will come from these and that hybrids will be the most valuable use for the limited cell quantities that will be available for legacy OEMs.Problem is manufacturers spend an extra $1000 to make a plug in hybrid with minimum battery requirement. Now car eligible for $7500 tax credit. Offer the car for say $5000 above ICE version and advertise after tax credit you get the car for $2500 cheaper. Big extra profit, little Climate Change benefit.
What a waste (subsidized misallocation) of precious batteries when they are forecast to remain in short supply for years! I hate to see my tax dollars spent to actually slow the mission.Full credit for 7kWh hybrids is simply ridiculous. I think they missed a decimal point.
It should be 70kWh or more for full credit.
If 7kWh stays the threshold it will be essentially giving money to legacy ICE to stay in business.
Pretty sure that’s the point……
If 7kWh stays the threshold it will be essentially giving money to legacy ICE to stay in business.
Yeah... was just speaking to the issue of foam removal discussed... I would imagine much more involved with cells in a structural pack, including potential cell-to cell or cell-to-honeycomb bonding...In the case of Tesla they already know what the foam is made of, and can test a sample in a test tube in a lab.
Others can break off a piece and, run tests on it.
My doubt is whether a 3rd party could refurbish the pack to the standard that it could get a warranty as a structural pack.
Removing the cells, testing them individually then selling them for use in other applications seems possible,
ICE car sales have pretty clearly peaked. Toyota can at best tread water here while Tesla gobbles up share of the mid-high end of the market and slowly moves downstream.It is to their advantage. It subsidizes the sale of vehicles with gasoline engines for the next ten years, enabling OEM's to get more benefit from their large capital investments in ICE manufacturing and slowing the transition to BEV's. Tesla will keep improving the cost effectiveness of BEV's, but it will be some time before their manufacturing capacity is a threat to Toyota, and in the meantime the fossil industry can lobby for more subsidies which their friends might provide while braying about helping people with lower gas prices.
I think the stock is stuck right now, someone go bump it to break it loose!
Is that after the split??I'd say the odds are higher that @StarFoxisDown! is unhappy at $1200 because the beta is still lagging and the call wall at $1205 is being protected. Rinse and repeat every $50 until the stock is at $8500. At that point, it will just be mildly content of:
Also, a plug-in hybrid might serve as training wheels for those who are afraid to go fully electric.
So like you, I think it could do some good even if the spending is wasteful.
I think I'll buy a lottery ticket.Already shook my sofa cushions. Someone else is up this time.
ICE car sales have pretty clearly peaked. Toyota can at best tread water here while Tesla gobbles up share of the mid-high end of the market and slowly moves downstream.
I know that buying my daughter a Prius in 2013 is what first got me thinking about BEV.
this isn't 2013.
we shouldn't be encouraging ANYONE to buy a hybrid. It's the worst of both worlds, adding massive, totally unnecessary amounts of weight and complexity and maintenance to a vehicle.
In 2022, it's a terrible decision. When I talk to people about EVs, I beg them to buy one, but I also tell them, "I know they are a luxury right now. If you can't swing one, please just find a nice, efficient gas car. Hybrids have all the disadvantages of gas, plus all the disadvantages of lugging around a battery, but with more maintenance and complexity than either system on it's own."
Now I’m nervous. StarFoxisDown! just went green.At this point, I’m fine with the bill. There’s no union clauses and Tesla isn’t excluded for the most part. Yes the Model 3 LR and P are, but I have a feeling Tesla will work around that. Tesla also wins big on energy and solar as well as getting credits for the Semi.
And the biggest reason I’m ok with the bill is no cap and it last for 10 years. There’s a lot of ways Tesla could have been screwed over with caps and limits so good to see they aren’t there.
Yes this bill extends the viability of hybrids…..but in reality it’s fools gold. Because the ban of the ICE vehicle is coming, and sooner in places like Europe and China. And anyone trying to extend their relevance through hybrids (cough Toyota) will pay the price.