You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Honestly it's all about your budget. The rule of thumb is Buy the biggest battery you can afford. If it's in your budget then do it.
Two things:
1. Your state is ideal for screenshots.
2. By the time you get your car all these grey superchargers will be red.
I'd get the standard range and spend the difference on bells and whistles.
View attachment 240012
That's amazing. There must be lots of Colorado reservations.
My wife and I pondered this a lot and decided that the base model is fine. We can do everything we'd need with the 220mi range and $9000 will get a hell of a lot of rentals for the (maybe) once per year we might need more. Yes, I'd like the extra speed and range would be "nice" but totally not necessary for my family. Saving money is nice.
Whatever rated range means I don't need to discuss range or rules of thumb anymore is the range I want. The Model 3 310 may not quite accomplish that goal given 310 is more like 230-250 in most situations. But it's close. The Model 3 220, which is really more like 150-170? Not even close.Honestly it's all about your budget. The rule of thumb is Buy the biggest battery you can afford. If it's in your budget then do it.
Based on the Model S (and really any other car), it depends on the driver, weather, and terrain. I get better than EPA, some folks get worse. Everyone's real world is different. Here's how you can tell.I'm hoping there will be some independent testing showing how the real-world highway range compares to the EPA rating before placing an order.
Rated range is basically EPA. What you get depends on a number of factors. On my S85, I have an average of 246 Wh/mi over 94K miles about half of which are highway miles. Not everyone does that well, but saying 310 is more like 230-250 isn't correct--unless you're talking about -20 weather with snow covered ground.Whatever rated range means I don't need to discuss range or rules of thumb anymore is the range I want. The Model 3 310 may not quite accomplish that goal given 310 is more like 230-250 in most situations. But it's close. The Model 3 220, which is really more like 150-170? Not even close.
Rated range is basically EPA. What you get depends on a number of factors. On my S85, I have an average of 246 Wh/mi over 94K miles about half of which are highway miles. Not everyone does that well, but saying 310 is more like 230-250 isn't correct--unless you're talking about -20 weather with snow covered ground.
At the risk of sounding "poor" I just can't justify a 60k vehicle. And I feel that in order to get a complete vehicle that doesn't feel like a neutered EV I can't get away for less than 45k. (Base Model, + 5k for the only available upgrade package + 5k for AP). Now I'd like another color besides black and better wheels but those are truly optional things.
Having manual, cloth seats, no covered storage and possibly no basic cruse control (no one has confirmed either way on that) for 35k just seems like it's not the vision that Tesla is selling to me anyway. So I'll need the 45k car, Can't slap another 9k on that for range I'll use once a year.
Having manual, cloth seats, no covered storage and possibly no basic cruse control (no one has confirmed either way on that) for 35k just seems like it's not the vision that Tesla is selling to me anyway.
Having manual what? not sure what you're talking about here..?
On the other thread there was mention that not having spare tire saves plenty weight, so it gives better range. How about if you only charge up to half-full, how much weight that would save and give better range/kWh rating? What's the weight of full battery of electrons? Improve your MPGe by only half charging
Manual seats.
The first comma in that sentence separating the two adjectives for the seats was quite confusing given it was in the midst of a list.
And no Oxford comma either. Tsk, tsk.