You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reminds me of a story from 1965. A proud owner of a brand new Ferrari noticed a bystander admiring his car. "It's beautiful", the admirer said, " Is that one of those new Ford Mustangs?"In that case I'll remove the T in back and but a Ferrari horse back there.
View attachment 244745
Do you know how frothing mad that would make the BMW people?View attachment 244829
Anyone else find this possibility funny?
Oops didn't mean physical badge.. will be called S, X, 3 with no physical ID. You'll just know.Tesla can increase the kw by softwear push. They did it with the S70, you could pay $3+k and get a 75 even though your car still was badged as a 70. If I understand you will still be badged as a S, X, 3, or when it shows up Y.
Tesla owner, long time Tesla investor, EV driver since 2007. What is it that you think is "not known"?
1% of ~4000 cells is 40 cells, not 3 or 4. The system designed to be able to tolerate when cells fail. They have "blanks" that fill the gaps if/when they opt to reduce the cell count. So no SW or tooling changes are needed. When you are making 10,000 cars per week, a %1 reduction is 400,000 cells saved per week and ~20 million per year. That's doesn't seem so stupid.So basically leaving out 3-4 cells somewhere? That seems like such a stupid idea. I am 100% sure that it a) doesn't work in most cases and b) that the complexity of changing the SW and especially the tooling would be more expensive, than the little bit of cost savings.
The point was/is that they could be taking a new path with the Model 3. "just because they've never done it" does not mean it isn't smart for them to do it this time.name one example of Tesla reducing their battery pack size in the past after gaining other efficiencies?
1% of ~4000 cells is 40 cells, not 3 or 4. The system designed to be able to tolerate when cells fail. They have "blanks" that fill the gaps if/when they opt to reduce the cell count. So no SW or tooling changes are needed. When you are making 10,000 cars per week, a %1 reduction is 400,000 cells saved per week and ~20 million per year. That's doesn't seem so stupid.
PahIf you're gonna do that, might as well go with: P120D
Pah
P140DR
Future proofed
Does this mean the well heeled models now have to suffer badge superiority withdrawal syndrome ?Reduces badge envy and badge anxiety
Tesla can reduce the pack capacity by a similar 1%.
So basically leaving out 3-4 cells somewhere? That seems like such a stupid idea. I am 100% sure that it a) doesn't work in most cases and b) that the complexity of changing the SW and especially the tooling would be more expensive, than the little bit of cost savings.
The point was/is that they could be taking a new path with the Model 3. "just because they've never done it" does not mean it isn't smart for them to do it this time.