I honestly wasn't aware of the arbitration process at the time. I mean, I knew vaguely that it existed but I was under the impression that "the manufacturer always won" and it wasn't even worth trying. Then I saw some people here get things decided in their favor.
Since I already paid I don't know if that makes it worse. Or better. When I paid for the replacement there was nothing on "UV", just that I was told twice that it would be replaced, then suddenly told it was "customer pay" and "there might be a resolution down the line but nothing firm". Basically it was all rumors on forums at the time, nada from CS or the SC. I knew that the -C revision screens existed, my car was still new, Tesla was offering no solutions, and I wanted the problem fixed.
As far as lemon law goes, I probably could... I've had a lot of other problems. (Though I'm running out of time, CO lemon law is only one year and its already August) -- Finding a lemon law lawyer that isn't shady is kind of difficult though. And I've been told that if you do that, you'll basically never be welcome at Tesla again.
It's interesting that some people have been offered to have their car bought back, over this freaking screen issue, others have had the screen replaced - and me, I've had a rats nest of problems on top of all this on a car that still isn't a year old; (autopilot / cameras / object view / blindspot detection often not working; both IC and MCU screen yellowing, water in headlights and tail lights, misaligned rear hatch-never fixed) - and all Tesla has offered to do for me is take it in for another week after week after week where they sit on it for days and then replace another repeater or b-pillar camera that they've already replaced twice.