You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To be fair, we're talking about model years and incidents that are 4-5 years old now. Nissan says they worked to address the issues and rolled out an AEB update in mid-2018, so the incidents are likely greatly reduced or eliminated.
The system works!
They rolled out the update in mid-2018 but it sounds like it wasn't taken up by enough of the fleet, so they initiated a "voluntary service campaign" in 2019 to increase awareness of the update and bring in more owners. I haven't looked into the 85 documents from the first closed investigation, what I'm referencing is the open investigation with the latest update on 16-Jun-2020.So...they "fixed" it in Mid-2018, but a year later reports continued to be so bad NHTSA opened another investigation?
Nissan Rogue Braking Issue Prompts NHTSA Investigation
Nissan Rogue braking issue prompts NHTSA investigation into 675,000 SUVs over complaints that the automatic emergency braking (AEB) system engaged with no apparent obstruction in the vehicle’s path.www.consumerreports.org
The problem of course is you have no idea if it WILL do emergency braking. It's pretty easy for a car maker to avoid PB (that is, false positives) .. they just dial-down the detection thresholds etc. But of course, that means you are more likely to get false negatives (the system failing to brake when it should).Not yet. It has about 25k miles on it.
Haven't had any false braking or close calls that I can remember. Wife loves her TACC...she hates the Tesla TACC and won't use autopilot. She drives the Tesla about 30% of the time.
There was a recall for the Mitsubishi FCW when I first bought it. They did a software update.
Yup, guess it doesn't work if I haven't tested it then. Time to go run into a orThe problem of course is you have no idea if it WILL do emergency braking. It's pretty easy for a car maker to avoid PB (that is, false positives) .. they just dial-down the detection thresholds etc. But of course, that means you are more likely to get false negatives (the system failing to brake when it should).
CR can say whatever they want.Then they're worse for that specific drive. Not in general.
LOL. As usual you have no idea what you are talking about ...I think Nissan/Mitsu, others dont get nearly as much attention because of one main factor: Their CEO's have not/are not stating that by end of 2019, you will be able to summon those cars from NYC to LA with no human intervention.
CR can say whatever they want.
All I know is, Mitsubishi passes the wife test and Tesla TACC does not. To most men, that's all that matters.
I dont think anyone is arguing Teslas sales success, demand for their (very fast) vehicles, supercharger network, etc.Whereas my wife loves Teslas system, has had no issues with it, and plans to buy one whenever her current SUV dies
And that seems a lot more common than your case.
I mean, overall US sales numbers are one obvious example...
but also owner satisfaction.
Tesla rates #1 among all car brands at both JD Power and Consumer Reports. Though to be fair neither even rates Mitsubishi because they don't sell enough vehicles to get useful survey results. Still, Nissan, whose driving system they apparently copied, ranks near the bottom with CR, they do better with JDP but still well below Tesla.
So it seems in general Tesla owners are happier with their vehicles than...anybody else.
For example owner satisfaction.... Tesla rates #1 among all car brands at both JD Power and Consumer Reports. Though to be fair neither even rates Mitsubishi because they don't sell enough vehicles to get useful survey results. Still, Nissan, whose driving system they apparently copied, ranks near the bottom with CR, they do better with JDP but still well below Tesla.
So it seems in general Tesla owners are happier with their vehicles than...anybody else.
What you can't stand, you mean of course. And it seems to me that pretty much everything he's set out to deliver he has delivered on. Mass-produced EVs, a supercharger network, battery factories, car factories, breakthroughs in range, charging speed, autonomy etc etc etc. Not to mention SpaceX and all they have achieved.What people cant stand is a deceitful leader, whose word means nothing, and whose product is riddled with phantom braking problems that have gotten worse, not better, over time.
Your welcome..And it seems to me that pretty much everything he's set out to deliver he has delivered on.
So lack of radar use, is the excuse for the phantom braking. None of the cars reporting phantom braking are using Radar..just vision.I don't think there is a need for denigration here. Clearly Tesla is doing something very impressive on FSD. Especially since they moved to just vision.
ok so what it is you want? The FSD stack, even in beta form, goes a long way to solving phantom braking because it has to as part of its raison d'être. By the time it ships it's likely that PB events will be in the noise floor (and probably most won't be PB, they will be real but the human driver was just unaware of the actual cause). And no, you're not going to get dumb CC because Tesla's solution itsnt to dumb-down, its to smarten up, like it or not.So lack of radar use, is the excuse for the phantom braking. None of the cars reporting phantom braking are using Radar..just vision.
Is that your final answer as you line the pins up?
Cuz I have the bowling ball ready...
Yes, a free grand is always niceI'll take stupid gotcha questions that utterly miss the point for $1000 Alex!
For example owner satisfaction.... Tesla rates #1 among all car brands at both JD Power and Consumer Reports.
Just the beginning. You know what else beat the MS/X in customer satisfaction...a Kia. So I don't put much weight in this cult style community where the majority of the cars sold were only built in the past 3 years. Give out of warranty owners the same satisfaction survey...The survey they "plunged" in was not owner satisfaction--- so the fact you posted it in reply to my mentioning being #1 in owner satisfaction means you either didn't actually read past the headline of your own story- or you're being intentionally dishonest.
Which is it?