I commute 100 miles a day and see no difference in the nags on my X100D AP2..
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
2018.26 3bbd9fd .-
- Thread starter bugout
- Start date
Thanks, I didn't know the P cars had their own egg (I assume that's what that is.... ).
And, if something as 'major' (you know what I mean) as a nag timing change is involved, you'd think it would be a quicker rollout.. perhaps we are the testers, even more so than usual, to see how much we screw up with a different timing!
I saw Dan on What's Inside got this "Software update required" message. I've never seen that before:
WHAT'S INSIDE? (@whatsinside) | Twitter
WHAT'S INSIDE? (@whatsinside) | Twitter
Nilnoc
Member
On my car, I have not seen a change in the auto present driver's door with 2018.26. It still works.
Huh.... wonder if they now have a message for a failed install that needs intervention, where before you just waited (and waited and waited...) until you called support?I saw Dan on What's Inside got this "Software update required" message. I've never seen that before:
WHAT'S INSIDE? (@whatsinside) | Twitter
I've seen this same warning message "Software update required" on the Instrument Cluster (IC) only, mid-update or immediately after update (sometimes for a period of minutes) before both computers have finished handshaking with a common software version.
One one occasion, an update failed to complete (twice) and the message remained on the IC until the update was retried & subsequently concluded successfully.
If you encounter this message for a significant length of time, I'd suggest rebooting both the IC & MCU.
Cirrus MS100D
Member
I was having vector map tile loading issues all day today, but we're still on 2018.24.1, so I wonder if there was a server issue that made loading the tiles problematic? If I zoomed way out it seemed OK, but zooming in caused it to display a vast emptiness. Satellite view was fine, it was only the vector tiles on the MCU.
goddy
2015 S85-Autopilot
goddy
2015 S85-Autopilot
Has there been any Noticable change with MS with AP1, with this new Firmware update? My MS is at Service center and got notification on my research mobile APP that it's been updated to 2018.26.3bb
This happens when the IC software version mismatches the CID/MCU software version, is the photo taken during the update? If you sit in the car and watch your car update you will probably see it.I saw Dan on What's Inside got this "Software update required" message. I've never seen that before:
WHAT'S INSIDE? (@whatsinside) | Twitter
rod_c
Member
I encountered a bug with 2018.24.1. My air suspension was incorrectly reporting it had a malfunction, which left it inoperable. Air suspension height could not be adjusted in manual or automatic mode. Tesla pushed 2018.26 to me which, according to Tesla Service, contains a documented bug fix for this issue.There is no mention of it in the public documentation, however. Thanks to Tesla Service for the quick help and for the firmware push.
I think I had that bug too, although it didn't actually stop the suspension from working in my case. A few weeks ago I got a warning message on the dash saying something like "air suspension requires service, contact your service centre". I thought here we go and then the message disappeared the next time I started the car and I cycled the ride heights up and down and everything was working fine. Didn't get any further warnings after that and now just updated to latest firmware. I was a little worried it was the beginning of a problem with the suspension (perhaps a slow leak), but good to know it was probably just a software bug!
rod_c
Member
Sounds like you experienced the bug, too. Tesla told me the short term workaround for the bug was to put the car to sleep. I did that and it worked, but I lost all my saved locations for auto-height adjustment so my car scraped on my driveway the first time I came home. I'm glad to have a 'permanent' fix. Hopefully there are no new, hidden gremlins.
Updated to 26 on my 100D AP2.5. Main difference I noticed, like some on this thread, is that autopilot doesn’t slam on the break harshly when I was following another car and it slowed to a stop. It seems to use more regen breaking then break softer at the end to provide a smoother AP ride in traffic.
Agreed. When it was "surprised" previously it would slam on the brakes very early only to decelerate slowly after that. Now it seems to be much more gentle, even in the "tailgate" mode of setting following distance to 1.
SeBsZ
Former Vendor
Friendly message: Brake, not break.
