deonb
Active Member
People keep using this response when those of us say let the younger workforce back into economy and their daily lives. I don't get it. It's not like we're saying let everyone out of quarantine. We're clearly saying that the at risk age groups need to stay in quarantine. For me that anyone above the age 50+ is not allowed back at work. Employers could easily institute age scanning and anyone above the age of 50 is sent back home and/or reported for breaking their quarantine. At a certain point, it become personal responsibility for those that are at high risk to protect themselves and if they chose to ignore their quarantine orders, than so be it.
There are other options that are just as effective as Lockdown, Lockdown, Lockdown without crumbling the world's economy.
The only demographic that won’t require millions of hospital beds if this spreads uncontrolled in that group is people between the ages of 0 and 19.
Is that your planned workforce?
EDIT: I see I got a couple of disagrees almost immediately. I did the math again and saw there are 75 million under 19s in the US. At the current US rate, 1.6% to 2.5% of them require hospitalization. So that would mean 1.2 million to 1.7 million people under the age of 19 requiring hospitalization almost simultaneously.
Ok, you guys are right, I was wrong. You won't even have your under 19 workforce.
Last edited: