Remind me gain, what is Unsworth suing for? Damages? How much?
I don't think I've seen a number.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remind me gain, what is Unsworth suing for? Damages? How much?
Tweet was accurate:
Name any Union plant where the employees get stock options as part of their union negotiated contract. It was not a threat, it was reality.
Elon Musk on Twitter
View attachment 460987
"US fought War of Independence to get rid of a 2 class system"
Ahem, the leading figures were wealthy slave owners who didn't want to pay taxes without having their say?
He is, all his 'wealth' is Tesla and SpaceX stock. Heck, he's had to borrow from friends to pay the rent before.Musk is claiming he is "financially illiquid", meaning his $35bn wealth is tied up in investments.
His insurance company seems like it doesn't want to pay his legal bill either.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
Not sure what was the point of Unsworth's legal action asking about AIG. Would Musk seriously try to not pay a legal judgement by claiming he can't mortgage or sell his stock? No, he wouldn't, nor would any court believe that.
What case is this regarding? All the attacks others have been doing against Tesla?He's trying to claim poverty to reduce the fine he is going to get hit with.
I'm not an expert but the US system allows for punitive damages, i.e. an amount that will hurt the loser as punishment for what they did. So Musk is claiming that it won't take much to hurt him because he doesn't have much cash.
Unsworth's legal team are hedging their bets. If the court doesn't order Musk to sell/mortgage some stock it might order his insurer to pay out instead. They have to pursue all possible avenues for extracting cash from him.
What case is this regarding? All the attacks others have been doing against Tesla?
Thank you for explaining that! Greatly appreciated.No the one where he called that guy a paedophile several times. Turns out he's not a paedophile and libel is expensive.
Thank you for explaining that! Greatly appreciated.
It's legit to assume those foreign to that area (Thailand, in this example) that are going to that area are up to no good. It's pretty much as certain as the rumors that Weinstein was up to no good, and he would sue people for libel all the time. It's not as libelous to claim they're likely doing no good as to claim someone in a better area or of better reputation is up to no good. Someone foreign to Thailand in Thailand has a lot to prove just by being there. Sorry, but it's just a fact. It's the same as Hollywood actors having a lot to prove that they aren't psychopaths or deviants, since pretty much 99.99% of them are. I'm with Elon on this one. Tweets are short so aren't expected to be 100% qualified like normal speech. People visiting Thailand have a lot more to explain as a baseline condition than average people not visiting Thailand.
Anyway, on the countdown: 21 hours since the "offline for a few days" post.
Being the devil's advocate here, wouldn't Unsworth have to show what he claims is his damages?He's trying to claim poverty to reduce the fine he is going to get hit with.
I'm not an expert but the US system allows for punitive damages, i.e. an amount that will hurt the loser as punishment for what they did. So Musk is claiming that it won't take much to hurt him because he doesn't have much cash.
Unsworth's legal team are hedging their bets. If the court doesn't order Musk to sell/mortgage some stock it might order his insurer to pay out instead. They have to pursue all possible avenues for extracting cash from him.
I've had two friends go recently. One was a single male in his 40s who was going to attend one of his best friend's weddings. Another was a family of four who did a trip through Thailand and Laos. Neither of them were there for nefarious reasons. Both of them raved about the culture and the food.That's total BS. Typical close-minded American viewpoint.
Plenty of foreigners live in Thailand, I know some myself, none of them are pedos or rapists.
Lot of people also retire there since there is a low cost of living.
Being the devil's advocate here, wouldn't Unsworth have to show what he claims is his damages?
Still yet, it will come down to the basics that it you have money, you have lost a bunch of freedoms.In the UK, yes. In the UK you can only claim back your costs. But in the US they have punitive damages too. And if you are very rich, like Musk is, it takes a very big fine to punish you.
Musk is worth something like $35bn. What kind of fine will hurt him? That's what they are trying to discover right now, what assets and what insurance he has so they can calibrate the fine to be painful.
He really is muppet. He's already pissed away $40M with a single tweet and now he's going to lose even more money because he couldn't resist calling some random guy a paedophile when he trashed his submarine idea.
Did you miss the filing attachments that allegedly show a conman convinced Musk that he was a Private Investigator and fed Elon false negative info on the plaintiff?In the UK, yes. In the UK you can only claim back your costs. But in the US they have punitive damages too. And if you are very rich, like Musk is, it takes a very big fine to punish you.
Musk is worth something like $35bn. What kind of fine will hurt him? That's what they are trying to discover right now, what assets and what insurance he has so they can calibrate the fine to be painful.
He really is muppet. He's already pissed away $40M with a single tweet and now he's going to lose even more money because he couldn't resist calling some random guy a paedophile when he trashed his submarine idea.
So you’re saying, that it is OK to call someone a pedophile, if he is western and goes to Thailand? Incredible bullsh*it.Thank you for explaining that! Greatly appreciated.
It's legit to assume those foreign to that area (Thailand, in this example) that are going to that area are up to no good. It's pretty much as certain as the rumors that Weinstein was up to no good, and he would sue people for libel all the time. It's not as libelous to claim they're likely doing no good as to claim someone in a better area or of better reputation is up to no good. Someone foreign to Thailand in Thailand has a lot to prove just by being there. Sorry, but it's just a fact. It's the same as Hollywood actors having a lot to prove that they aren't psychopaths or deviants, since pretty much 99.99% of them are. I'm with Elon on this one. Tweets are short so aren't expected to be 100% qualified like normal speech. People visiting Thailand have a lot more to explain as a baseline condition than average people not visiting Thailand.
Anyway, on the countdown: 21 hours since the "offline for a few days" post.