FSD and EAP was introduced at the same time.
Sure, but that has nothing to do with the class action suit that was ONLY about EAP, not FSD.
I purchased FSD straight away and received the payout.
You received it for owning EAP.
Which was required to own in order to ALSO buy FSD.
Buying FSD made no difference at all to if you got the payout or not- only having bought EAP did.
I don't remember the exact terms or wording but I do know it included the FSD purchasers
It
absolutely did not
. Since the features were in lock step for both purchasers at the time
This is not true.
EAP and FSD were separate purchases. You could buy EAP by itself... or you could buy EAP
and also buy FSD.
The class action was ONLY about EAP features being delivered late- and only for EAP purchasers. All FSD buyers were ALSO FSD purchasers, so included due to that, not due to owning FSD.
It
can't have involved FSD since at the time FSD had
no specific features promised by any given date
, it is a bit confusing. I wonder if that settlement absolves them future litigation.
Since it had nothing to do with FSD it certainly does not.
And since EAP is feature complete (and has been for years) there'd be nothing further there to sue over.
In case you're still unclear here's an older purchase screen from years ago (it's for a Model 3, which wasn't in date range of the suit, but the feature/cost split was the same as we're discussing)- EAP on the left-- which if you bought it before a certain date you got the class action settlement because promised features were late.... and FSD on the right, as a SEPERATE purchase but only possible to purchase if you already owned FSD- and promising nothing by any specific date and for which $0.00 has been paid out on any class action to date.