Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

FSD rewrite will go out on Oct 20 to limited beta

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
A friend posted this photo on FB, it's in San Francisco. I'd dearly love to see the FSD beta do a u-turn from the second from the left lane.

132043070_10159079417891663_58405989756531678_o.jpg
 
FSD beta is actually mind blowing and impressive though. Tesla is making very fast progress towards "level 5" robotaxis, which many people didn't think was possible until 2030.

Years ago, when the tech was more primitive, yeah, many people did not see L5 happening before 2030. But as the tech has gotten better, L5 looks to happen sooner. Today, I think most AV companies say L5 will happen before 2030. For example, Mobileye is saying they will deliver L5 as ride-hailing by 2022 and L5 in consumer cars by 2025.

RPJSZbj.png
 
FSD beta is actually mind blowing and impressive though. Tesla is making very fast progress towards "level 5" robotaxis, which many people didn't think was possible until 2030.
Unlikely level 5 will happen before 2030. I'll by happy if I'm wrong. Although level 4 that works in 99.9+% of the situations will be very helpful. It will be quite a challenge to handle snow, ice, flooded roads, fog, dust storms, poorly designed intersections, harassing drivers, teenagers getting in the way with a death wish, signs based on potential weather conditions, etc...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HighZ
FSD beta is actually mind blowing and impressive though. Tesla is making very fast progress towards "level 5" robotaxis, which many people didn't think was possible until 2030.


L5 is not happening with the current sensor suite.

Write it down- then re-read it every new years eve as it keeps being correct forever.

Even NoA still turns off in only moderate rain because other than forward there's only 1 camera covering most of the way around the car and with no way to clear rain.

The current cameras have blind spots (particularly close and low to the vehicle- and to the sides if any object is blocking one of the side cameras) too.

I certainly think something like L3 highway is very doable with current sensors... MAYBE L4 with some significant ODD bounding. L5? Not so much.


I think L5 they're gonna need to add some more cameras both for redundancy and simply to see the stuff they can't see in many everyday situations... (something like both regular and fisheye lenses on the lower front and rear fenders would allow both a "real" overhead 360 parking view, and easy cross-traffic visiblity when say the B-pillar cameras can't see well from an object... and honestly a rear radar wouldn't be the worst idea either... nor would cameras capable of higher framerates if they're gonna rely on just visual for speed estimation at distance).
 
So at best it goes to EAP at v.15, but likely v.20 plus.

Then another 8-18 mos before general release. This is smart summon all over again, and we all know what the end product was...

Tesla should already release the new AI to everyone so that it can already start learning (and improve) from Autopilot scenarios. Does not make sense wait for full FSD or FSD beta, just restrict it to Autopilot.
 
Tesla should already release the new AI to everyone so that it can already start learning (and improve) from Autopilot scenarios. Does not make sense wait for full FSD or FSD beta, just restrict it to Autopilot.


Doesn’t work like that. All of the driving instructions, afaik, are hand coded. NNs handle perception only. How to deal with what it sees relies on humans programming the instructions. Until Dojo is up, there’s no NN handling driving instructions. More data than what they’re getting already won’t improve anything more than how much they’re already improving. If more data would help Tesla, you could be sure they’d be getting more already.
 
Doesn’t work like that. All of the driving instructions, afaik, are hand coded. NNs handle perception only. How to deal with what it sees relies on humans programming the instructions. Until Dojo is up, there’s no NN handling driving instructions. More data than what they’re getting already won’t improve anything more than how much they’re already improving. If more data would help Tesla, you could be sure they’d be getting more already.

Sounds like spaghetti to me, maybe few more rewrites?

Anyhow, it should be possible to upgrade Autopilot to drive as well as the FSD Beta (just without navigation).
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanCar
Sounds like spaghetti to me, maybe few more rewrites?

Anyhow, it should be possible to upgrade Autopilot to drive as well as the FSD Beta (just without navigation).

Again, that's not how the software/NN stack works. The current autopilot uses an older NN stack which has not been changed. The new stack is (initially) focused on solving problems related to city driving (though a large part of it can be applied to highway driving also at a later time). And, as others have noted, Tesla have enrolled enough FSD beta drivers to give them all the data and feedback they can cope with .. more would just be duplication. As the stack matures based on this feedback they will be able to open it up to a larger set of testers to focus on edge cases.
 
Again, that's not how the software/NN stack works. The current autopilot uses an older NN stack which has not been changed. The new stack is (initially) focused on solving problems related to city driving (though a large part of it can be applied to highway driving also at a later time). And, as others have noted, Tesla have enrolled enough FSD beta drivers to give them all the data and feedback they can cope with .. more would just be duplication. As the stack matures based on this feedback they will be able to open it up to a larger set of testers to focus on edge cases.

Dirty Tesla has shown it works better also in non city situations, they should already roll out these benefits to Autopilot users. It's a severe design flaw if they can't leverage feedback from a wider Autopilot fleet. They should be able to expand gradually and also get feedback gradually, starting from simpler scenarios and expanding to more elaborate scenarios.
 
Last edited:
When FSD can handle the vast majority of the problems Chazman92 reports then I would see not a problem expanding the program. His videos do an excellent job of identifying unprotected left hand turns that have serious safety concerns.
How would ou feel about them rolling it out with confirmations required for various maneuvers that are deemed risky?