They are making improvements and following the footstep of what others are doing in driving policy. But these improvements are incremental.
They haven't reached any exponential curves which Waymo and Cruise have clearly blown past.
People who read these release notes and think there's some quantum leap happening after each update is naive.
These people then make comments like below:
Basically Flowery Release Notes >>>>> An actual driverless car
If you come to reality where I live, actual performance of the system is what matters.
Like this clear safety disengagement on 10.69.3 at 8 Mins 15 seconds
Think about just how bad FSD beta has been historically (ver 8, 9, 10, etc), running into stationary objects, walls, construction, straight into other cars, driving the opposite side of the road like its not nothing, crazy jerky wheel and driving.
None of these issues you will find with this year's launch of Xpeng's CNGP and Huawei's NCA system. Why? Could it be they didn't rush and release it for clout? Ofcourse none of that matters to some people because having flowery release notes proves you are the "leader in real world ai"
This video illustrates my point exactly. It took Tesla FSD over a year to stop trying to run into balant obvious stationary objects/walls.
But ofcourse Tesla is 10 years ahead because they pushed out un-ready software to the wild as
@powertoold would have you believe