aroth
Member
I must strongly - with every fibre of my being - disagree with your comments about solar panels making more sense on houses than on cars. With that kind of starting point in your thinking, you are killing off progress and innovation.
More like directing it. It's simple mathematical fact that a car has vastly less surface area available than a house/roof. You have ~6 square meters to work with, assuming that you're able to utilize 100% of the exposed surface area. At current PV efficiencies you'd get a max output of ~1.2kW. Which really makes it difficult for the idea to be viable without solving the space problem first.
To do better you'd either need to make a major breakthrough in PV efficiency (get it up to ~80%, say; which as far as we know is not theoretically possible) or to find some other way of working around the limited surface area. Maybe the car could have a retractable mast array that it can deploy when parked, or something else that increases the total PV surface area when not driving.
But it's definitely correct that with current technologies it makes a lot more sense to focus on houses rather than on vehicles. And that focusing on vehicles has to involve something more innovative than just sticking our current generation of PV tech on them.
Last edited: