It would improve even more if it adjusted the speed to the limit before reaching the sign in both directions, like the legacy OEM:s have done for the last ten years.I think it would improve AP and FSD if it would read the yellow "advice" signs.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would improve even more if it adjusted the speed to the limit before reaching the sign in both directions, like the legacy OEM:s have done for the last ten years.I think it would improve AP and FSD if it would read the yellow "advice" signs.
most of the OEMs do that through map data though, which as we've seen is often inaccurate.It would improve even more if it adjusted the speed to the limit before reaching the sign in both directions, like the legacy OEM:s have done for the last ten years.
This is technically illegal, so Tesla will never do it:It would improve even more if it adjusted the speed to the limit before reaching the sign in both directions, like the legacy OEM:s have done for the last ten years.
Lol @ other carmakers doing it for years, but Elon being so truthful and ethical with his word that he’d NEVER do same thing.This is technically illegal, so Tesla will never do it:
Any signposted speed limit comes into effect at the exact point the sign resides. In other words, if you’re driving at 30 MPH through a 30 MPH zone and you’re about to enter a zone that allows you to drive at 50MPH, it is technically illegal to begin accelerating beyond 30 MPH until you’ve reached the sign indicating the higher speed limit.
Contrary to what people may try to tell you, by the letter of the law there is no “buffer” or grace period near a speed limit sign, which is why you’ll notice that when the speed decreases drastically, you may see a helpful warning sign telling you this before the actual speed limit sign so you’re not having to suddenly slam on the brakes to get down to the posted limit before you reach the sign.
Curiously, I had the car sit tight at a No Turn On Red sign while the light was red and didn't even try to creep up until the light changed to a blinking yellow. I sat there with my foot above the brake, ready to disengage FSDb if it jerked forward during the red, but it never moved an inch, despite having cars to the left occluding its view.The list of signs that FSDb can read isn't very long sadly, it seems unable read most warning signs, doesn't read no right on red for instance.
Haha, OMG that's hilarious. So when I get pulled over by a cop, I can tell him it's Elon's fault and to give him the ticket instead?Lol @ other carmakers doing it for years, but Elon being so truthful and ethical with his word that he’d NEVER do same thing.
“We will (among other things) create doctored videos faking FSD capabilities, but we’d never exceed the speed limit 10 feet before the sign. That would be wrong.”
Possibly, but I dont think it should obey them (perhaps just use them as warnings of upcoming curves etc), since almost no-one pays much attention to them, and you'd certainly get honked if FSD stuck to the advised speeds (and maybe even rear ended).I think it would improve AP and FSD if it would read the yellow "advice" signs.
AP and TACC would benefit from reading the warning signs and slowing down more for curves.Possibly, but I dont think it should obey them (perhaps just use them as warnings of upcoming curves etc), since almost no-one pays much attention to them, and you'd certainly get honked if FSD stuck to the advised speeds (and maybe even rear ended).
However, since this thread is about AP/TACC being used on winding roads (which the manual says its not designed for anyway), and FSD handles winding roads very well, I'm not sure there is much to be gained atm.
name one brand+model that speeds up in anticipation of the speed limit rising up. I would like to test it out myself.Lol @ other carmakers doing it for years, but Elon being so truthful and ethical with his word that he’d NEVER do same thing.
“We will (among other things) create doctored videos faking FSD capabilities, but we’d never exceed the speed limit 10 feet before the sign. That would be wrong.”
no, FSDb DOES read speed limit signs .. but only the mandatory ones not the advisory (yellow) ones.
This is technically illegal, so Tesla will never do it
So it's a game of whack-a-mole with regulators? "Let's have our ADAS features break the law and see if NHTSA notices." What is this, a Folgers commercial?Just a comment about this... rolling through a stop sign is illegal but Tesla allowed that...Granted it was a user selectable feature but they still implemented it....till they had to take it away because yea, its illegal.
I mean, im guessing slamming into stationary emergency vehicles is also a violation of some law...but that hasnt slowed Elon down much has it?So it's a game of whack-a-mole with regulators? "Let's have our ADAS features break the law and see if NHTSA notices." What is this, a Folgers commercial?
So funny, 2101. Yes, Teala coded the cars to seek and slam into emergency vehicles wherever possible. Stop being so obtuse. There's a massive difference between coding the car to do something, and the car doing something that was unintentional. California stop was an intentional feature, and was smacked down by regulators and removed. Slamming into emergency vehicles is not intentional.I mean, im guessing slamming into stationary emergency vehicles is also a violation of some law...but that hasnt slowed Elon down much has it?
Well that's a relief. It was just gross incompetence.Slamming into emergency vehicles is not intentional.
Explain. How is it gross incompetence? I'm really curious how you come to that conclusion.Well that's a relief. It was just gross incompetence.
I agree . . . the driver is at fault here for not being able or just not paying attention.Well that's a relief. It was just gross incompetence.
If you are referring to the recent 4 AM crash into the firetruck, I haven't seen any reporting that ADAS functions were in use leading up to the impact.I agree . . . the driver is at fault here for not being able or just not paying attention.
Your original statement was that the car(s) did not intentionally hit the emergency vehicles, which of course is correct. My obvious conclusion is that the vehicles slammed into emergency vehicles because the code (FSD and/or Autopilot) was buggy. And I contend it is grossly incompetent to write and release "full self driving" code that will slam into an emergency vehicle at full speed.Explain. How is it gross incompetence? I'm really curious how you come to that conclusion.