I know this is going to be savaged here, but I’m gonna say it: FSD that still needs to be supervised is close to worthless, a pure rich person nice-to-have on consumer vehicles.
Having to pay a massive one off fee, or a large monthly subscription, or x dollars per mile, to use FSD to get you to a destination that you were already going to drive to anyway is a needless massive expense in the eyes of many I think, when you have to still supervise your car.
It will, of course, become extremely valuable once it can be used unsupervised, either as a driverless robotaxi or as a personally owned vehicle where the driver has to provide zero attention to and can spend the time on something else instead.
In the meantime however, the cheaper Tesla’s ASP gets as it punches into ever lower market segments in terms of discretionary income, the lower the take rate of FSD will be. So I don’t think the current take rate of FSD is in any way helpful to disclose as it doesn’t provide any sort of relevant data to what the take rate for full FSD unsupervised will be when/if it gets approved. Unsupervised FSD vs supervised FSD are two entirely different value propositions.