I am now on 2022.44.25.5. I recently returned from a ~1200 mile trip from Miami, Florida to Jekyll Island, Georgia with a few diversions along the way. I used FSD for the entire trip. On all restricted access highways the car behaved pretty much as I would have done. On minor roads the only times I intervened were to:
- increase clearance passing pedestrians and cycles (3 times);
-making complex left turns (four interventions);
-one with a 160 degree left, followed by a 90 degree right and another sharp left (humans have serious problems with this one),
-one unprotected left from a restricted access highway with sweeping curve in one direction, and a steep bridge access on the other, with cones on the turn
lane. FSD did this successfully twice, awkwardly but successfully with abrupt maneuvers to avoid a raised island after the turn. Once it failed this turn and I
took over.
-On two occasions FSD ailed to take the correct exit leaving Interstate access roads, so I took over.
There was heavy rain at times and on some days heavy fog also. FSD handled these conditions quite perfectly.
Nearly always FSD speeds changes tended to be slightly more abrupt than I typically am, but at no time was that inappropriate.
Overall this is vastly better than it has been before, enough so that I think some income recognition might have been appropriate for 4h quarter.
The nags are becoming an irritant now, since the performance is so good. It would be desirable, I think, to generate nags when the system recognizes increased probability of error rather than the present situation.
For the first time I begin to see realistic potential for true FSD in many situations. The entry to destinations and parking seems some time away.
If occasional manual lane changes count as interventions I had many more. I do not count those, since it was my preference, but in no way necessary.
- increase clearance passing pedestrians and cycles (3 times);
-making complex left turns (four interventions);
-one with a 160 degree left, followed by a 90 degree right and another sharp left (humans have serious problems with this one),
-one unprotected left from a restricted access highway with sweeping curve in one direction, and a steep bridge access on the other, with cones on the turn
lane. FSD did this successfully twice, awkwardly but successfully with abrupt maneuvers to avoid a raised island after the turn. Once it failed this turn and I
took over.
-On two occasions FSD ailed to take the correct exit leaving Interstate access roads, so I took over.
There was heavy rain at times and on some days heavy fog also. FSD handled these conditions quite perfectly.
Nearly always FSD speeds changes tended to be slightly more abrupt than I typically am, but at no time was that inappropriate.
Overall this is vastly better than it has been before, enough so that I think some income recognition might have been appropriate for 4h quarter.
The nags are becoming an irritant now, since the performance is so good. It would be desirable, I think, to generate nags when the system recognizes increased probability of error rather than the present situation.
For the first time I begin to see realistic potential for true FSD in many situations. The entry to destinations and parking seems some time away.
If occasional manual lane changes count as interventions I had many more. I do not count those, since it was my preference, but in no way necessary.