It's been 3 long years in the FSD beta program as a tester and everyone is aware of the regressive nature of software updates for FSD with 2 steps forward and 1 step back. This Dr Jeckyll and Mr Hyde behavior is evident with so many who have been in the program as long as i have. I was hoping for many changes with FSD V12 and was excited to try it with the addition of neural networks to rapidly improve evolution of FSD.
The thing that bothers me is the Dr Jeckyll/Mr Hyde on/off behavior of the software. You can have a great day with no interventions and the very next day with the same route and similar weather and traffic experience curb rash, collision, lane malfunctions.
I don't have an answer why this is but today was a bad one. It almost collided into an Audi A6 and was also lane wiggling indecisively and unsure whether to be in right or left lane. I had to intervene and disable FSD within the last second to avoid rear-ending the Audi.
For all the advances of FSD V12, it still cannot be trusted and demands more attentiveness than would be normally the case if you were driving without it. It's my feeling that supervised FSD has little to no market value because it demands so much attention and may actually be more dangerous as it may give a false sense of safety and security.