caskater47
Member
Sent. Which version are you getting?Can anyone give me a referral code. I am about to order my Model 3. My e mail is steveblt01@gmail. Thanks
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sent. Which version are you getting?Can anyone give me a referral code. I am about to order my Model 3. My e mail is steveblt01@gmail. Thanks
I'd take this as the exact opposite. This means that the car will feel far faster and nimble on the road to the average driver. Only track nerds will care about technical fundamentals and endurance for all day track sessions.
The vast majority of drivers just want their car to go fast from a stoplight to show off or while merging.
I agree. Stomping on the accelerator away from a stop light is fine and all, but i’ll take more power higher up any day. The only place my car gives up anything acceleration-wise to fast ICE cars on the track is on the straights so I much prefer the higher roll on powerSee your point but I think that it also depends on the area you drive around in. Europe is, for the most part, very different from the US in what regards road/street configuration. In my country/my area, outside highways, 90% are twisties, so the fun here is not at all "drag" racing between traffic lights. That is 100% not applicable to my driving in my area.
Please note that I do have MANY thousands of miles driven in the US, in all areas, so I can compare driving habits and styles. I'm actually in Miami as I write this, about to go in a 6-day road trip to Dallas with an Avis Mustang ))))
That is a good point, but it's not like the Model 3 handles poorly. It handles better than 95% of all other vehicles. To do better (ignoring power) you are looking at M3s, Alfas, mini coopers? etc.See your point but I think that it also depends on the area you drive around in. Europe is, for the most part, very different from the US in what regards road/street configuration. In my country/my area, outside highways, 90% are twisties, so the fun here is not at all "drag" racing between traffic lights. That is 100% not applicable to my driving in my area.
Please note that I do have MANY thousands of miles driven in the US, in all areas, so I can compare driving habits and styles. I'm actually in Miami as I write this, about to go in a 6-day road trip to Dallas with an Avis Mustang ))))
I'd like to see what lap 2, or 3, was like, but we all know that, at some point, in a 20 minute heat, the model 3 wouldn't be able to keep up - and that's fine. I am very happy that the model 3 performance I have on order, is mainly a comfortable, powerful sedan. That's what it should be - worrying about track time, generally, IMO, screws up cars.
An electric track car will be interesting. I'm sure it will be surprisingly cerebral, and I'm sure it will be faster. Mid-engine cars are faster, and more cerebral than front-engine cars, but I enjoy something with a big motor, and side pipes, more than a mid-engine car, going around a track.
But, between Tesla, and Workhorse, if they get their pick-up out, I doubt I'll buy another non-electric/hybrid car, aside from toys.
That is a good point, but it's not like the Model 3 handles poorly. It handles better than 95% of all other vehicles. To do better (ignoring power) you are looking at M3s, Alfas, mini coopers? etc.
This. Worth noting to that the 3 is built on a sedan body like the 3 series so even best case it's not apples to apples. And this is the Gen1 of the Performance 3. I'd love to see Gen2 drop a few hundred pounds and have better heat management. Imagine being able to buy something like an Alpina version of the 3. Get the 3 down to the weight of an M3 and it should be ridiculous.Sure, I'm fortunate to have a 911 (996) Turbo so that's what I end up comparing it with, which might be unfair, I know. Still, the Tesla handles very, very well, but in comparison to nimble, light, sports cars, it's no match. I'm sure, in the future, ICE will lose comparisons in all respects, but we're not there yet. Batteries need to go lighter, much lighter.
Anyway, the fact that we are even thinking of comparing a Model 3 with a 911 is really something, and qudos to Tesla for that! I wouldn't dream of comparing a Renault Zoe, Nissan Leaf or Hyunday Ioniq with any decently performing car.
Several of us here have run a bunch of 20min sessions on the track. With track mode on it definitely can keep up.I'd like to see what lap 2, or 3, was like, but we all know that, at some point, in a 20 minute heat, the model 3 wouldn't be able to keep up - and that's fine. I am very happy that the model 3 performance I have on order, is mainly a comfortable, powerful sedan. That's what it should be - worrying about track time, generally, IMO, screws up cars.
An electric track car will be interesting. I'm sure it will be surprisingly cerebral, and I'm sure it will be faster. Mid-engine cars are faster, and more cerebral than front-engine cars, but I enjoy something with a big motor, and side pipes, more than a mid-engine car, going around a track.
But, between Tesla, and Workhorse, if they get their pick-up out, I doubt I'll buy another non-electric/hybrid car, aside from toys.
That'll be quite a trick with 200kWh of battery. The Model 3 battery density is roughly what the Model S was, I think? About 210Wh/kg. That'd make it roughly 950kg, or 2100lb for the battery pack alone! You're talking 1400lb for the three drive units + "glider". With a frame capable of supporting that 2100lb (plus occupants).There's no way the Roadster will weigh more than the Model 3. I am guessing it will end up around the 3,500lb mark, possibly even less.
There's always a next problem...Several of us here have run a bunch of 20min sessions on the track. With track mode on it definitely can keep up.
Potentially literally as well.If the battery is significantly lighter than that it'll have repercussions that'll vibrate far past that car, and the track capability for the Roadster it implies.
I've went back and made an alternative word choice for there. But yeahPotentially literally as well.
You want to be out there longer than 20 minutes?I'd love to have the Roadster range in my P3D. After a better brake pads (and rotors?) solution, that's the next problem on my list for lapping days.
I often start a track session with the intent to do just one or two fast laps separated by a cool down lap, as I know that is the best chance I have for a PB during any given session. The problem is, once I get out there I find it so hard to force a cool-down, and harder still to come in before the checker. The brake over-heat issues do force a periodic cool-down lap, but with the RWD, I have not really had an issue with power limitations. Even out at Big Willow with 30 minute sessions I found myself staying out to the bitter end. I put in 58 laps over four sessions out there and barely made it back to the supercharger at the end of the day.You want to be out there longer than 20 minutes?
Most lapping days are 5-7 sessions ranging from 15-25 minutes. On a non-snowy day (i.e. rain or shine), I'm lucky to get 2 sessions in the morning and 1.5 in the afternoon -- that's with a trip to the supercharger over lunch. I'd like to get the full day that I'm paying for.You want to be out there longer than 20 minutes?
Ditto.I often start a track session with the intent to do just one or two fast laps separated by a cool down lap....
The problem is, once I get out there I find it so hard to force a cool-down, and harder still to come in before the checker.
I’m more & more coming to the opinion that shorter time on track is more. The 3 has essentially zero “warm-up” requirement.Most lapping days are 5-7 sessions ranging from 15-25 minutes. On a non-snowy day (i.e. rain or shine), I'm lucky to get 2 sessions in the morning and 1.5 in the afternoon -- that's with a trip to the supercharger over lunch. I'd like to get the full day that I'm paying for.