Sorry but I'm siding with FTLRKT here. Not everyone is drinking the board Kool Aid. And what difference does it make if someone has a handful of posts? Does that make their limited contribution any less valuable?
I do not believe that only having a handful of posts in and of itself make a poster's contributions less valuable. I do believe that in the case I was referring to, the very few posts over three years before posting in an attempt to "use" TMC for personal gain helped highlight the attempted abuse.
I, and I hope most others, view TMC as a community. A community is about give and take. When new members join the community, at first they generally benefit from the community more than they give back to it, in the form of knowledge they are gaining from reading the posts, etc. But before long these new members are giving back to the community by participating in discussions and often helping even newer community members.
In my mind, someone who had fewer than ten forum posts in over three years was not making much of an effort to participate in or contribute to the community. The fact that he or she then saw an opportunity to attempt to "use" the community for personal gain speaks volumes. That's how the number of posts factors in, in my mind.
Neither of them would ever think of doing it, but if Bonnie or Nigel or someone who has contributed a great deal over a very long time were attempting, in some small way, to benefit in some personal way from a post on the forums, I think in general the community members would have much less of a problem with it, because of what those people have already done for the community. Of course that's a moot point, because it's not something they would do. I bring up the example only to demonstrate that in my mind, and I think in the minds of other forum members, there --IS-- a difference between community members who contribute positively and those who don't.